01/14/1997 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

+1 --- •-_-°the samples to tlie building department for their review. The members discussed approvingithe proposal on the condition that the colored samples be presented. Mr. Tallon decided it would be best that the samples be delivered to the building department as soori as possible; that the architectural review board review the samples; and the proposal return to planning commission in two weeks. Mr. Tallon verified the motion is to continue the proposal till the next meeting when the concems are addressed. He asked the clerk to put this on the next agenda. The motion was seconded by T. Brennan and unaviinously approved. This proposal will return to planniug couunission January28, 1997. 4) H'igh-Tech Pools, 31333 Industrial Parkway Revised proposal to redesign west (side) wall and complete construction in two phases. Original proposal approved by planning commission March 12, 1996. Mr. Hammerschmidt explained the proposal. Mr. Tallon wondered when phase II will be started. Mr. Hammerschmidt advised, he would like to complete both phases as soon as possible, but could not coufuin any dates. Mr. Brennan was concerned that phase II may not be constructed in a reasonable amount of time, thereby creating a steel building. Mr. Hammerschmidt explained originally the plan was to complete the proposal in one phase. The top portion ofthe building was to be the steel siding and the bottom portion the split faced brick. Mr. Hammerschmidt stated, due to financial restraints, he is now asking to complete construction in two phases. The common wall, between the two phases, is now proposed to be coustructed eutirely out of the steel material. Mrs. O'Rourke noted it appears the money is being saved in the masonry work. Mr. Hammerschmidt responded, eventually tliey will need the masoiuy, as code requires a fire wall and this is just a matter of installing it in phase I or phase II. Mr. Tallon acknowledged, when the proposal was originally presented, it was for a one phase development. Mr. Hammerschmidt advised a letter has been forwarded to the commission that includes a list of the proposed changes and reasons for the changes. The members reviewed the letter and the revised plan. The possibility of including a fire wall in phase I was discussed, however neither party agreed on the details. The members reviewed the landscape architect plan. Mr. Hammerschmidt was willing to temporarily include additional landscaping, until the construction of phase II has begun. Mr. Tallon was concerned because there are no guarantees that phase II will ever be completed. Mr. Hammerschmidt advised, he had every intention of completing phase U. W. Tallon wondered why they would install additional landscaping that would just be removed in a short period of time. Mr. Hammerschmidt responded, the temporary landscaping is an attempt to make the proposal more acceptable. He believed the only change is to the common wa1L Mr. Brennan disagreed and noted the commission already approved an entire development. The members had no further questions. Mr. Tallon asked if any members from the audience had questions; no one came forward. R. Tallon made the motion on High Tech pools, 31333 Industrial Parkway, a revised proposal to I redesign west (side) wall and complete construction in two phases. The motion was to recommend the following: allowing construction of this development in two phases; the revised proposal to redesign the west wall be denied; and the west wall should be constructed out ofthe split faced brick as originally• presented. The motion was seconded by A. Manning and unanimously approved. . N. NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: 1) Steve Lot Split and Consolidation Plat The proposal is to split permanent parcel nu.mber 233-07-06 into a smaller lot with an existing house and garage and to join the southerly or rear portion of the lot to the abutting parcel (P.P. No. 233-07-09 or Parcel `A"). The larger portion of P.P. No. 233-07-06 with the existing house and garage is to be joined with the abutting landlocked parcel (P.P. No. 233-07-10) to form Parcel W. Location is the