My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/11/1997 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1997
>
1997 Planning Commission
>
02/11/1997 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:33:33 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 9:29:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1997
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
2/11/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
and the access would be from Westview, not from Brookpark since the development would not be able <br />to afford to pu.rchase the rights from the limited access highway, so access from Brookpark is not <br />realistic. Any multi-family would generate less tax revenue to the community and school district, but <br />since clvldren would live in the multi-family there would be more service costs. He stated that there is <br />no question that a successful office development would generate more tax revenues, but the office <br />would have to be there to achieve it, and it is not realistic to expect it. In reference to the amount of <br />retail in North Olmsted as compared to the average and to other communities, it is true the North <br />Olmsted has more square footage per resident than other communities; however, retail does not <br />distribute itself evenly based on population or by community. Market needs are dictated by the. shopper <br />and require regional centers. North Olmsted is a regional center and 90% of the commercial tax base <br />comes from retail, and the city must make sure tlus economic base remains competitive. This can be <br />maintained by permitting development that ineets market needs such as Hoine Depot, acknowledging <br />more retail development on suitable sites such as Parcel "E", particularly with the restrictions that have <br />been offered. The city and developers must continue to pursue re-occupancy, retro-fitting, or re- <br />positioning existing space to meet the needs and stated that Biskind Development is constantly looking <br />to re-position any vacancies or assure re-occupancy of vacancies in their existing facilities. He <br />mentioned other centers that are going through re-positioning. Also there is a concem that a large <br />business might go out of business, but Hoixie Depot owns the facility and it is a coiporate asset so there <br />is a long term interest in preserving the investment. The building could be reused as is, or subdivided. <br />He mentioned how retailing has changed in the last 10 or 15 years in various retail categories and noted <br />that adjustments in retailing will continued to be needed. Elgain regarding competitiveness of South <br />Park Mall, the newspapers reported that as much as 15% of North Olmsted market might shift away. <br />That might reduce the traffic, but in the long term implications would be the further vacancies of retail <br />stores that are available which would result in devaluation of property and tax revenues. Developing <br />this parcel as a lower density single family, cluster or condominiums was mentioned previously, but the <br />owners have had no offers for that. He questioned the feasibility of this since, new construction would <br />have to go for a higher selling price as the existing housing in the area and there would be additional <br />development costs to offset the impact from Brookpark Road, and there are alternative residential sites <br />to absorb the housing in this price range. He does not believe that this use is realistic to consider this <br />since the city has accepted, as a public policy, certain development intensity by virtue of the zoning and <br />the comprehensive plan. The multi-family use would be consistent with that policy if the retail is use is <br />not approved. <br />Mr. Corsi introduced Mr. Charles M. Ritley, an independent fee appraiser and listed his credentials. <br />Mr. Ritley explained that he has been involved in appraising inillions of square feet of retail space and <br />office build'mg space, and this property was rezoned for office building in about 1988 or 1989 which <br />was the peak office building market in terms of leasing activity, price levels, lender eagerness to <br />promote this kind of development. At that time it would appear that this parcel could be developed this <br />way. That world fell apart with down sizang, etc. and office buildings values lut bottom in 1993-94. <br />Today, a developer can not afford to put new construction in a secondary location and there are other <br />areas in the metropolitan area and 'm North Olmsted that would support first class office building <br />development. These buyers will not go on BrookpaPk Road across f'rom VVaI-Mart. He stated that with <br />the re-organization of retailing, the customer is the beneficiary of this re-organization since he gets a <br />lower cost product for his dollar. Retail has a better opportunity to reorient itself to a changing <br />environment. In 1990 through 1993, in the Beachwood office place 'market, seventeen out of the <br />approxiYnate 50 build.ings in that corridor were either in foreclosure, had turned deeds over to the banks <br />or lenders were re-structuring loans to try to save it for going under. Beachwood suffered tremendous <br />tax loss as a result. The cost of retrofitting an office building is far more expensive than it is to retrofit a <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.