Laserfiche WebLink
A <br />light the parking lots; and lights over the receiving doors. There will be landscaping on the front and <br />along the side to hinder drivers from backing out onto the side street and to soften the area. They have <br />changed the parking so there is two employee spaces on the side. They are plauning to replace the <br />existing pole sign with a ground sign, remove the air conditioning in the back, and rework the gutter <br />system so all water flows onto Forest City's property drainage on the site. He clarified that the bu.ildiug <br />lights will all be down lights, and the signage will be white with black letters. Since they had been asked <br />to remove the logo from the ground sign, there was not time to redraw it. He clarified that they had <br />been unable to contact the landowner to the rear where the air conditioner hangs over the property and <br />where the sidewalk is located, so they are going to remove them so they are not uifi7nging on another <br />property. They do not know exactly how they will work out the drainage, but there will be no gutters <br />on the rear of the building. Assistant Building Commissioner Rymarczyk advised that the laudscaping <br />plan will have to be re-submitted to the architectural review board for approval. It was decided that the <br />grouud sign should be submitted at the same time. R. Tallon moved to accept the Forest City Auto <br />Parts, 23789 Lorain Road, proposal to expand building with the inclusion that the landscaping plan and <br />pedestal sign be submitted to the arclutectural review board for approval before the proposal goes to <br />bzd. The motion was secouded by R Koeth, and unanimously approved. <br />Prior to the next request, plauuing- commission went into executive session with the Assistant Law <br />Director Dubelko to discuss peudiug litigation. <br />Chairman Tallon recouvened the meeting. <br />2) Richard Moran, 4650 Dover Center Road. <br />Request conditional use permit to use an existing dwelling, in a residential district, as a adult care groug <br />home. Heard by planniug commission 1/14/97; Heard by board of zoning appeals 2/13/97. <br />Returned to planning commission at the direction of the Law Department. <br />Chairmau Tallon asked Mr. Moran or his representative to step forward. Mr. Kramer, attorney and <br />director of the Housing Advocates, who advised that he represented the Moran's in the matter of having <br />their house become an adult care facility. He explained that the United States Congress passed the <br />Federal Fair Housing Amendments in 1988 in order to allow people with disabilities to live in <br />community residences like this one, rather than in institutions. He advised that restrictions on the <br />number of adult care facilities and group homes that had been reasonable prior to the 1988 amendments <br />are now presumed to be unreasonable. The nature of the family has changed and Congress has seen fit <br />to pass this statute, there is also recognition by the United States Supreme Court in the case of <br />Clanebourne versus Clanebourne Living Center that provides as a national policy that housing for the <br />disabled is to be mainstreamed. The idea behind tumiug this home into an adult care facility is to offer as <br />a normal living environment as possible. These people cannot be distinguished from any other single <br />family people in the city. Accord.ing to this principle, people with severe disabilities, whose families <br />cannot provide the support they need, should be able to live in the community of their choice, in as <br />normal a way that they can. This offer by Mr. Moran will provide opportunities for such community <br />living for up to sixteen people so they can achieve as much of their full potential as human beings as <br />possible. There is a real issue as to whether a conditional use permit, is even necessary, but they are <br />willing to come before the board to provide information about it. This is not a nursing home or an <br />institution and no support services are being planned which would require the conditional use permit <br />that the board is being asked to consider. There will be no medical, dental, etc. services provided and <br />these people will be living in a home as family members. The legislative history behind these <br />amendments talk about the need of this law and they provide that these new subsections will also apply <br />2