09/09/1997 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

TX. X. zoning code in order to implement the provisions of said new chapter 1167: Sections 11.18.01, 1118.02, 1118.03, 1126.06, 1135.01, 1136.04, 1137.02, 1139.01, 1141.02, 1145.03, and 1149.03. It was clarified that this was a new chapter to include towe.rs and putting in restricrions for them. In response to Mr. Brennan's questions, Assistant Law Director Dubelko advised in the case of an accident the city would be held harmless and the developers would have to provide insurance. He advised that this ordinance was created by Building Coimnissioner Conway and any questions should be directed to him. Mr. Tallon wondered if there was any urgency and if there would be a problem with holding this over until the next meeting so the members can have more time to study it. Mr. Conway had no problem with this, but pointed out that there were six carriers and two have approached the city. These structures would only need approval as a minor changes if they were proposed for the Industrial District. The requirements for them in a residential district are the most restrictive. He cautioned the commission that tonight's developer will be back in 5 years for another tower if they are successfuL He advised that eventually these antennas will be mounted on top of street light poles. Of these six carriers, probably one or two will fail, some might even just try to get tower locations to rent them, and not maxket their service. Mr. Tallon asked what the city could do about the company who just built a tower to rent. Mr. Dubelko stated that Federal Law protected the license holders, the city probably would not be under any compulsion for soineone who did not hold a license. Mr. Tallon wondered what would happen if they did hold a license, but did not want this area. Mr. Dubleko believed that if they could not demonstrate their need for their own use, the city would be within its rights to turn it down. Mr. Herbster asked if it would be within the city's rights not to grant 100% coverage. Mr. Dubelko stated that is an issue to look into, but he believed this is a utility which had a right to provide maximum service. Ms. Cameron ALston wondered what the industry standard was, it was possible that they were asking for more than they needed. Mr. Tallon would like to ascertain if the commission had any leeway, or if they would be compelled to make it the best possible. Mr. Dubelko will look into some of these issues before the next meeting. Mr. Conway stated that it would be best to get ahead of other localities so the city is not limited to the locations that will service the area. The city does not want to be in a position where other suburbs are controlling where we can put ours. Mr. Brennau stated that people are not used to the poles, but it is a lot invasive than the other utilities. The members will discuss the ordinance at the next meeting. Mr. Herbster would like a consultant to study it. Mr. Conway did have a consultant, but it did not work out. The commission might recommend this to the administration. Mr. Dubelko had att ended seminars, and has some knowledge, but planning coininission could recommend hiring a consultant with more expertise. R Tallon moved to keep Ord. 97-73 in committee and would make recommendations at the next meeting. The motion was seconded by Ms. Cameron Alston, and unanimously approved. OLD BUSINESS: No items. ADJOURNMENT: R Tallon moved to excuse the absence of Mr. Koeth and Mr. Manuiug, seconded by T. Brennan, and unanimously approved. The meeting was adjourned at 10:05 p.m. A R B. Oring, 8 o£ Commission