09/04/1997 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r" , ',' -I% - OLD BUSINESS: Timberview Homes, PP#235-12-061 Review of conclition. Heard May 1, 1997. It was noted Timberview Homes would like to flip the house back to the way it was originally presented. Mr. Dunlap, representative from Timberview Homes, has received a signature from all of the residents notified for the May 1, 1997 meeting in support of flipping the home back so that it is uniform with the rest of tlie homes on the street. The members agreed the home can be flipped back to the way it was originally presented. The clerk questioned if the minutes need to be revised. R. Gomersall motioned to revise the minutes of the May 1, 1997 meeting where the request for variance for the construction of a 2 story dwelling; a 139 square foot variance for the first floor area; a 17 foot front setback variance; a 3 foot side yard variance; and a 4 foot variance on each side of proposed dwelling for distance from adjacent build.iugs. Revised to flip the home back in accordance with the original plans as stated in the motion of May l, 1997. THIS MOTION WAS WITHDRAWN. Law Director Gareau advised that the board should amend the prior variance that was granted to reflect the flipping of the home back as it was originally requested. Somehow the clerk will have to put on the May 1, 1997 minutes that the ruling was modified in the September 4, 1997 minutes. R. Gomersall moved to amend the condition of the variance granted May 1, 1997 to Timberview Homes (P.P. 235-12-061) allowing the design of the home to be ui accordance with the original request for the foot print. The motion was seconded by T. Koberna and unanimously approved. Assistant Building Commissioner Rymarczyk wondered if the board can set a period of time which a proposal can be tabled. He explained there are two signs (Jiffy Lube and Debbie D's) that have been tabled for some tune. Law Director Gareau advised according to Roberts Ru1es of Order when something is tabled it dies. He clarified if a proposal is continued till a-date_ certain, the case would be continued until a date certain. Mr. Koberna believed eventually the books should be cleared. Mr. Gareau advised as a housekeeping measure the applicant should be notified, unless they make anangements to be placed on the agenda the next month, action will be taken to permanently table the case. Mr. Koberna questioned if Debbie D's has given up on their request. Mr. Rymarczyk advised Debbie D's has not come to any conclusion at this time: He questioned if the suggestion is to call both parties and advise them if tliey do not appear at the next meeting they will be washed off the agenda. Mr. Gareau agreed; as a courtesy, tliese people should let us know because they are takmg up a spot on the agenda. Mr. Gomersall explained this type of case should be placed at the end of the agenda. Mr. Rymarczyk wondeied if it can be determined for future meetings that if a proposal is tabled, and the representative does not appear at the next meeting they will be permanently dropped. Mr. Gareau stated there are extenuating circumstances and the board should have the right to table a case to a date certain. He advised if someone is on the agenda and they do not °attend the meeting it,can be voted on. The clerk was told to contact these two applicants and questioned what she should tell them Mr. Koberna explained they should be told if they do not attend the next meeting action will be taken with or without their presence. The meeting was adjoumed at 9:15 P.M. R a , .-.,- ? - .,,,,?v. A. Comish, Assistant Clerk of Commissions 8