02/13/1997 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

was remodeled, the neighbors were assured by Mr. Moran that his home would not be used for this type of facility. He wondered what this home might be used for ten years from now, if the variances are granted today. Mr. Tirka was not necessarily opposed to this proposal, but was concerned aboui businesses infringing on this single family residential zoning. Mr. Gomersall noted Mr. Moran camf before this board previously and requested several variances to enlarge his dwelling. At that time, Mr. Moran assured the members of the board the intended use was for his family. These variances were granted based on the fact the home would be used as a single family residence. Mr. Maloney advised there is 8.384 acres of property. He clarified, Mr: Moran could, move the driveways on the north and south sides so that no variances would be required. Mr. Purper believed the traffic pattem on Dover Center Road would be effected if tlus proposal is approved. He-sighted these people will have visitors. Mr. McIntire advised this type of activity would be very nominal. Mr. Ebert noted tlus is a permitted use in a residential area u.uder state statute. He believed the board members should refer the proposal to the law department for legal advice. M.T. Ebert did not believe a variance was required for the north parking lot. Assistant Building Commissioner Rymarczyk advised the variances requ.ired were determined by scaling the site plan. Chaumau Gomersall elaborated variances are required for anything that does not conform to the code. Mr. McIntire stated all the residents will be ambulatory. Mrs. Dingess clarified ambulatory means. a person will require walking assistance from a nurse or aide. Mr. McIntire explained the people living in this home will not have vehicles, but they will be visited occasionally. Mr. Rymarczyk noted he did not figure on any cars for people living there, but only for the incoming traffic caused by them living there. Mr. McIntire agreed to screen the parking if required. Mrs. Dingess explained there are already eight or nine vehicles that come and go from this property. Mr. Moran stated she was full of c--p. Mr. Gomersall advised this comment was out of order and asked that Mr. Moran refrain from using that language. Mr. Koberna questioned if the site plan was submitted by Mr. Moran, or if it was something the building department drew. He advised there is a note on the site plan that states the frame garage will be moved to five feet offthe property line. Mr. Moran explained this has already been permitted. Mr. Maloney reiterated the dxiveways should be in compliance because there are rooms on both sides of the house. R. Gomersall motioned to approved the proposal of Richard Moran, 4650 Dover Center Road his request for the following: an 11.5 foot side yard variance at north properiy line; a 21.3 foot side yard variance at south property line; a 5 foot variance for driveway at north property line; a 7 foot variance for driveway at south property line; a 15 foot variauce for parking area at north property line and a 20 foot variance at south property line; a 10.5 foot height variance for existing structure. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section(s) 1118.02(fl(2)(b); 1118.02(fl(3); and 1118.02(F)(3). The motion was seconded by J. Maloney. Roll Callon motion: Gomersall, no; Maloney, no; Purper, no; and ICoberna, no. Variances denied. Assistant Building Commissioner Rymarczyk advised, as a result of tonight's decision, this will not be going to planning commission. 4. Carol Cymbal, 23595 Alexander Drive. Request for variance (1123.12). Request 4 foot variance for distance between dwelling and garage. Violation of Ord. 90-125, Section 1135.02(c)(2). Request special permit(1123.11). Request special permit to enlarge a non-conforming dwelling. Specialpermit required Ord. 90-125, Section 1165.02(d)(1). ? Chairman Gomersall called all interested parties before the_board. A' e oath was-administered to Mr. Lash and Mr. Perri, Mr. Lash, contractor presented the proposal. Mr. Gomersall advised he did not have a problem with this proposal, however there would be a fire wall on the side abutting the house.