05/21/1986 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

+- I ARCHITECTURAL BOARD OF REVIEW MAY 21, 1986 PAGE 2 3) North 0lmsted Beverage, south side of Lorain Rd. two lots east of Wedgewood Dr. Signs to be heard with building plans. Proposal not approved. P1ans included using a pole sign at now in use at the existing location. Board requested to see picture,of existing sign and any ch ange of copy planned. 4) Great Northern Technology Park, south side of Country Club Blvd. Signs (Heard with discussion of Technology Park II) Mr. Carlisle questioned if all signs must go to the Architectural Board of Review, since the ordinance does not state that defini.tely. In the past, signs for new proposals or alterations have been presented as a part of the building proposal in order for the Board to establish a di- rection for the signage. Board agreed to hear sign plans for Technology Park I at this time. Mr. Carlisle explained that one ground sign will indentify,.b.oth Technology Park and the Hampton Inn and may include some of the large larger tennants and that there will be several small direc- tory and directional signs. Signs wi11 be surrounded with a clear frame encasing a filigree pattern which will be a mill finished aluminum; back- ground of sign faces wi11 be .. champaign beige plexiglass faces; only th.e large ground sign will be il-luminated from the ground. Some build- ing signs may be installed with letters in red and no higher than 10". Mra Pattison stated that since this is the sign design for all Technology Park., tliis approval should be sufficient for the other phases of the projectm S. Ebin moved to approve the signs as submitted for Technology Park I and that same concept for Technology Park II, seconded by M. Casep Ro11 ca11 on motion: Ebin, Case, and Britton, Yes. Mr. Pattison atistained, IV. OLD BUSINESS: Regarding the ground sign on Plaza West which Mr. Ebin has mentioned at the last two meetings, a letter fxom Bob Cutler Signs was presented stating that arrangements are being made to run all wires from underground. Mr. Ebin stated that he would like to have the sign disconnected until this is accomplished.. V. NEW BUSINESSs 1) North Olmsted Beverage, south side of Lorain Rd. two lots east of Wedgewood Dr. Proposal to construct beverage store with drive-thru facility and video shop, (Heard by Planning Commission April 22, 1986). Plans were presented by Mr. Kazimarck and Mr. Ricchetti, designers, and Mr. Wagner, owner. No color elevation or samples of materials were pre- sented, Mr. Kazimarck explained that the building would be red or brown brick with stained gables, either T111 or exterior plywood, facia wi11 be cedar; light fixtures will be green enamel. He stated that materials and color wi11 be exactly the same as the plaza at West 231 and Lorain Roade They were told that photographs of the building would be accep= table as samples of materials. Planning Commission had requested elimin- ating one curb cut. Building Commissioner Spino advised that the ordi-