02/25/1986 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

.? ? ? ---- .. PLP.I?,TNING CO'?i?4ISSION FEBRt:tiRY 25, 1985 PAGE 3 moved to refer the retail building at 23900 Lorain Road *_o the Archi- tectural Board oi Review and to the Safety DepGYLmenL, seconded by T. Morgan, and unanimously approved. 5) The Doll HoLSe, 30036 Lorain Rd. Change of occupancy Lo convert ex_istina dwelling to retail sales building and review oi sitc plan. ?qr. and Mrs, urre`, owners, rlr. 3akubisic, contractor, and Mr. Paul, real estate agent, presented revised plans showing parking in rear. House is to be painted and upgraded and two bay tiTinaoks tiTi11 realace existing windows, but no structural cnanCes are pianned. The Commis- sion nad been advised by Mr. Johnson ot the Metro Parks Board that there was a deea restriction on the rear 200 feet of the property and that portion could not be deveioped or used for parking. Mr. and Mrs. lirrey were not aware of this, but the lot is 550 feet deep and they do not intend to use that part. Existing detached garage will be moved irom the side of the house tor about 60 feet to the rear. Six paricing spaces are planned (size of spaces shown do not confor-m to code and will be changed). They plan to remove two trees which obscur.es-the house and shades lawn, Under a proposed ordinance the CitST forester may have to approve the removal of these trees. Mr. and Mrs. Deener, adjacent property owners reviewed the plans and stated that they wauld like an- other tree removed which has damaged tneir driveway and hinders vision when pulling out of their driveway. 1ne Commission would like a recom- mendation from the rorester as to whether the trees should be removed. J. Burns moved to forward the Doll House, 30036 Lorain Road proposal to the ArchitecturaL Board of Review to the forester for his recomnen- dations related particularly to the three large trees in the front of the property, two of which the developer wishes to remove, the other which the neighbor wishes to remove, and to Engineering ror review of the paving and the retention system, and also we would like the Building Dept, to look at revised drawing of parking space size and locaticn; and to the Safety Department, seconded by T. IVlorgan. Roll call on motion: Burns, Morgan, Bierman, Traczyk, yes. Mr. Gorris, Nay. Motion passed. Mr. Gorris explained that he did not see the necessity of rererring this proposa2 to the Architectural Board_of Review. IE'. NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: I) Cherandorc Subdivision: - Location is the entire south side of Brookpark Road Extension between Dover Center Road and Sparky Lane, and both north and south sides of projected Brookpark Road Ext. east of Sparky Lane. Proposal is to rE-align existing parcels 232-25-7, 8, 34 and 232-26-6, 7, 11,12, 38 into six (6) sublots, and to extend and dedicate an additional portion of Brookpark Road Extension. City Engineer Schaller explained that tnis subdivision is re-alijning property 1-ines creating 6 sublot ana dedicating an existing portion of 3rookparl: Roaci Extension; there are building on some of the sublots. Two subiots, one the property of Nam Wah Express, and the otner with