My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/25/1986 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1986
>
1986 Planning Commission
>
02/25/1986 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:33:54 PM
Creation date
1/30/2019 3:21:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1986
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
2/25/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
? ? .. - <br />?'" ?` <br />PIyANIdING COMMISSIOI?? FEBRUARZ' 25, 1986 PAGE 2 <br />Chairman Burns requested that they eliminate the new curb cut and re- <br />vise the site plan to use only the existing driveway. Mr. Fazio agreed <br />and will present a revised site plan to the Architectural Board of Re- <br />view. Building Commissioner Spino pointed out that rear of property is <br />not a hard surface and cannot be used for required parking. B. Gorris <br />moved that the proposal for the Expresso coffee and doughnut kiosk be <br />referred to the Architectural Board of Review;and at the same time, we <br />request that Mr. Spino reconfirm the parking for this parLicular parcel, <br />that the parking for Rad-Air and the new kiosk will meet the code; and <br />to refer these plans to the Safety Department for their input; I would <br />suggest that the plans may be forwarded to the Architectural Board, they <br />should indicate that there will be only one curb cut; and to refer to <br />the Engineering Department, seconded by R. Bierman, and unanimously <br />approved. Mr. Gorris amended the motion to request that Mr. Spino also <br />check on the signage since there are two businesses on one pronerty and <br />as it refers to the menu board as well, seconded by Mr. Bierman, and <br />unanimously approved. <br />3) 28900 Office Park, 28900 Lorain Rd. <br />Proposal to construct office complex. <br />Attorney Pt; Giesser presented plans for complex which will have five <br />4,000 sq_uare foot units built in two different st_yles; retention system <br />wi11 lie installed; one acess drive is planned off Lorain Road with 80 <br />parking spaces; board on board fence is planned on rear property Iine <br />of adjacent residential neighbor, Commission questioned number of park- <br />ing spaces; it wouldseem that parking is based on the reauirements for <br />a sma11 business (less than_ 12,000 sq. ft) since each unit is only <br />4,000 sq, ft. However, it was pointed out that the entire complex is <br />over the minimum and possibly should_be figured as alarge business <br />whieli would req_uire more spaces. It was decided to table this proposal <br />in order to deternine which parking standard should be used. Mr. Elliott, <br />the adjacent neighbor whose side and rear property lines abut this pro- <br />perty, viewed the plans. Fence and trees are planned adjacent to his <br />rear property line and Austrian pines are planned parially along the <br />side line adjacent to the parking area. Mr. Elliott stated that he has <br />an easement through the rear property for cirainage. Mr, Giesser was <br />advised that he would have to submit a landscape plan showing a11 ex- <br />isting trees and stating whether they will remain or be removed. T. <br />Morgan moved to table the proposal to build the Office Park at 28900 <br />Lorain Road until the next Planning Commission meeting pending the re- <br />vi:ew of the parking and the interpretation of the ordinance relative to <br />parking requirement for this property from the Building Department, <br />seconded by B. Gorris, and unanimously approved. <br />4) Retail Building, 23900 Lorain Rd. <br />Proposal to construct retail building (second phase of Adon Eq_uipment <br />Co. proposal, originally heard by Planning Commission September 10, 1985) <br />Mr. Wilkes, the architect, and Mr. Schmidt, the owner, explained that <br />this is tlie second phase of their original plan. The first building is <br />still under construction. The former auto parts store will be torn <br />down, but the house on the rear of the property will remain. E. Traczyk
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.