03/25/1986 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 25, 1986 PAGE 4 and had probably not been recorded with the City. Mr. Dubelko stated that since building is 10' off residential property line and is legally non-conforming, any expansion would need a special permit from the Board of Zoning Appeals. Mr. and Mrs. Szabo, property owners on Bradley Road, gave a history of the properties involved and stated that they are concerned that there would not be enough room on this property for parking. They have problems with cars parking on the street now. Mr. Hevelone and Mr. Godfray, of the Timber Trails Home Owners Association, presented a drawing which plotted the properties and indicated a small triangular area in which building could be constructed and still conform to code. Mr. Hevelone as spokesman for the Homeowners gave the following reasons for their objections: 1) f actory will be in an area which is res- idential in character; 2) codes which require buffers should be enforced; 3) Mr. Hardy bought property in August, 1984 and should have been aware of code restrictions; 4) requested rezoning will not enable him to build legally on property; 5) water pressure in area is not adequate for proper fire protection as it is now; 6) roads in area could not hold up under the truck traffic generated by this expansion 7) property values would be decreased 8) City has designated Limited Industrial areas and these should be developed. He concluded by stating that this rezoning would be totally inappropriate in this area. Mr. Kipp, who is involved with the soccer program in the city, stated that such a factory could present a hazard to the people using the soccer fields and the proposed baseball diamonds. Mr. Thomas from Timber Trails and a member of the-Chamber of Commerce urged the Commission to make a commitment to the fair and consistent development of the west side of North Olmsted and suggested that this business could be relocated in the designated Industrial Park. Mr. Bonner and-Mr. Maximuk, also of Timber Trails,-,cand 30' set bacl supported Mr. Hevelone's statements and requested that there not be and concluded "shot gun rezoning". Chairman Burns quoted Section 1194.02 which re-_ quires a.50T buffer/*and concluded that these requirements would make these lots virtually unbuildable. Mr. Spi.no believed that this area is not an Industrial Park District, but should be considered as a Limited Industrial Area. Mr. Dubelko advised that the Limited Industrial Park District is the total land zoned Limited Industry. Commission discussed this matter further and concluded that even with the rezoning this business could not be expanded within the codes and the lot was virtually un- buildable; and concluded th at this area has a"hodge-podge" zoning at present and this rezoning would not solve the problem and would just serve a particular interest. _ T. Morgan moved that the rezoning request where the rear yard crosses 233-6-8 and 2?3-6-19 be approved as submitted, seconded by J. Burns. Morgan, Burns, Bierman, Gorris, Traczyk, Wixted, and Brown, No. Motion failed to pass. Request for rezoning is denied. V. COMANNICATIONS: Annual meeting of Regional Planning on April 17, 1986. Vi. NEW BUSINESS: Mr. Morgan requested that a letter be written to the Architectural Board of Review regarding their requesting developers to re-submit. certain items to their Board instead of to the Planning Commission. He suggested that they express their concerns in their minutes and require the developer to address them at the next Planning Commission meeting.