03/26/1986 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 26, 1986 PAGE 2 ? suggested. B. Gorris moved to approve the site plan for the 28900 Office park building subject to the following: 1) that the driveway which is shown as 24' be reduced to 22' and a 3' sidewalk be installed in front of the proposed buildings abutting what would be the western curb of the driveway of this parcel; 2) we realize that this existing site plan calls for 80 parking spaces, we have been advised by the Building Commissioner that 48 are acceptable to this development and the developer has indicated that he would like to go with 50, we would leave it up to•the BZD to determine the best layout for those 50 park- ing spaces; 3) we would like to pass on the memo from the forester re- lative to the trees and advise the BZD that while many of these trees may be nice to save, it may not be practical to save them in lieu of the fact of their relative proximity to the building; 4) I would like the BZD, since the Architectural Board of Review refused to*do it, to consider appropriate screening along the eastern most property in the rear, that property which.is owned by Mrs. Dahn; 5) also on the eastern property side, the part of the property that would ab ut the northem most property of Mr. Elliott would be screened by a 6' board on board fence and the trees_that were designed for that property line would be moved to the eastern most property line of this property, seconded by J. Wixted, and unanimously approved. Mr. Gorris would like to remind the Architectural Board of Review that according to Section 1217.01 that their purpose is to assist and advise Planning Commission so that when the Commission make requests regarding a proposal, they expect their advice on the matter.. Mr. Dubelko called the Commission's at- tention to the March llth Minutes stating that he should confer with Mr. Spino regarding whether -the proposed Office- Park should- be con-_- - sidered one building or five-, and stated that he wanted the Commi.s- - sion to be aware that he has not had the opportunity to confer with Mr. Spino on this and that he had not seen the Commissioner's report and could not offer an opinion as to the legality of his interpre- tation. 2) The Standard Oil Co., 25295 Lorain Rd. Proposal to construct new self service gas station and mini mart (ex- isting station will be demolished). (Heard by Architectural Board of Review March 19, 1986). ' Mr. Blessing and Mr. Fillingim of Standard Oil Co. presented revised plan showing additional landscaping; 4 parking spaces on rear line; and dumpster enclosure. Some trees are shown in grass area between them and the adjacent property; this area actually belongs to neighbor but they are attempting to get the owner's p ermiss ion to install these trees. In reference to the retaining wall, a report from Wellert Corgoration was submitted stating that there were no records avail- able on the construction of the wall, however, from their inspection they did not believe that there would be a problem with it at this time, and suggested an on-going visual inspection. Report will be included in this file. The Safety Department suggested eliminating the two drives closest to Lorain Rd. Developer has a problem with this, especially in view of the fact that the station across the street was permitted to keep all four entrances. The Commission pointed out that eventually relocated SR 252 would be put in north of Great