06/10/1986 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PLA2dNING COMMISSION JUNE 10, 1986 PAGE 3 wall; refer this to the Engineering Department, and again, that they pay attention to that so-called 3' retention wall in terms of how it might affect the drainage on the adjacent property, also with respect to the set back requirements that the Law Department raised concerning the retaining wall; we also refer this to the Saf ety Department and ask that they pay particular attention to the current location of the drive and what types of traffic hazards that might create, and ask that they look at some potential solutions or alternative driveway locations, if it does create a hazard,-particularly moving the driveway to the westerly most point of the property line on Lorain Road, also giving some consideration to moving back the stop line at Great Northern and Lorain Road; and also that the Building Department pay particular attention and review the parking re- quirements and the proposed parking on this parcel, seconded by B. Gorris; and unanimously approved. 2) North Olmsted Beverage, south side of Lorain Rd., two lots east of Wedgewood Dr. Proposal to construct beverage store with drive-thru facility and video shop. (Disapproved by Architectural Board of Review May 21, 1986) (Tabled by Planning Commission May 27, 1986). Proposal was tabled at the last meeting, and had been disapproved by the Architectural Review Board since no material samples or landscape plan had been presented. Mr. Kaczmarczyk presented a revised site plan with 21 parking spaces which will require 2 curb cuts, previous plan had 19 spaces and only 1 cut would be required. Planning Commis- sion had requested 1 curb cut be considered. Material samples and landscape plan had been presented to Planning Commission at the last meeting. Motion to approve had failed to pass. Mr. Kaczmarczyk_ad- vised that an assembly plat is being prepared and will be presented at the next meeting. Assistant Law Director Dubelko again expressed his concerns regarding the Commission approving the proposal without the approval of the Architectural Board,.since they are professionals and an advisory body to the Planning Commission. The designer stated that these are standard materials, and were listed on the plans. Com- mission studied plans and material schedule. T. Morgan moved that the proposal to build a beverage store, North Olmsted Beverage, on the south side of Lorain Rd, be forwarded to the Architectural Board 'of Review, seconded by J. Wixted. Roll call on motion: Morgan, Wixted, Bierman, Gorris, Traczyk, and Brown, Yes. Mr. Burns, No.. Motion passed. . ? -. 3). Aetna Door Co., 31546. Lorain Rd. Proposal to construct building in Limited Industrial Area. (Withdrawn from Planning Commission May 13, 1986) (Variance granted by . Board of Zoning Appeals June 4, 1986). Mr. Cancilla, the owner, advised that a variance had been granted from the 50' buffer which is required by the code when Limited Indus.trial property is adjacent to another district. He explained that the property on the west was rezoned General Retail in 1974, all the other surround- ing property is Limited Industrial. Two buildings are planned, they