06/24/1986 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 2 Plans had been approved by the Architectural Board of Review as submitted. Mr. Kaczmarczyk, representing the owner, stated that he has agreed to place the roof fans behind the front gable. Safety Department had no problem with plans as submitted. Twenty-one parking spaces are provided and two curb cuts are required. R. Beirman moved to approve the revised plans as submitted for North Olmsted Beverage, south side of Lorain Road, two lots east of Wedgewood Drive subject to the recommendations of the Architectural Board of Review and also the Engineering Department, seconded by E. Traczyk9 and unanimously approved. (Motion to approve the assembly plat for the two lots was made at this point see Section IV, item 2.) 3) Aetna Door Co., 31546 Lorain Rd. Proposal to construct building in Limited Industrial Area. (Variance granted by Board of Zoning Appeals, June 4, 1986)(Heard by Architectural Board of Review June 18, 1986). Chairman Burns advised that a variance had been granted to eliminate the required buffer on the westerly property line.___The Architectural Board had recommended that the metal panels on the ends of the building be en- tirely brown and that if inechanical equipment is installed on the roof, that screening plan must be submitted to that board. They had also sug- gested-that mounding-and-berming be installed__in_the lawn area. Mr. Cancilla, the owner, has no problems with the recommendations and stated he will install some mounding in the landscaped area but has no plans as yet. The Commission agreed that they had no problem with the brown and beige panels on the ends of the building as shown on the color elevation. The Safety Department had no problems with the proposal. The forester reported that he had viewed the site but was unable to determine where the property lines were and would like to meet with the developer. Mr. Wendell, the forester, was present and advised that there would seem to be some trees which could be saved. No landscaping plan showing the existing trees had been submitted. Assistant Law Director Dubelko stated that proposal should not be approved until such a plan is submitted. It was agreed to fonaard proposal to the BZD with the condition that the forester meet with the developer prior to the BZD meeting. T. Morgan moved to ap- prove the proposal to construct a building in the Limited Industrial Area, known as Aetna Door Company,31546 Lorain Rd., be approved as submitted with the recommendations of the Architectural Board of Review taking ex- ception with the one recommendation relative to the end walls being com- pletely brown, Planning Commission feels that the walls should be of the same color as the original rendering as presented by the developer, and that the forester review the site and the landscaping and present his con- clusions to the BZD at their next meeting, seconded by R. Bierman, and unani:msouly approved. 4) Barlo Plaza, north side of Lorain Rd., west of 30572 Lorain-Rd. Proposal to construct retail building. (Heard by Architectural Board of Review June 18, 1986). Architect G. Draeger presented revised plans which reflect the recommenda- tions of the Architectural Board of Review: dumpster location is screened, ground sign_is located at the west edge of property, and he also stated that there will be no building signs I on the mansard. The Safety Department had no objections to the proposal, but questioned the handicapped space on the north side of the building. This space will be used by the owner.