09/23/1986 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

- `,-- PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 23, 1986 PAGE 4 area which neither the development company, nor the homeowners, will be allowed to remove. In response to a property owner's questions Mr. Andreano, the engineer, explained that the new culvertwould be two to three times larger than the existing one; that water from the subdivision would be discharged downstream from the new culvert and retention is planned on the property. City Engineer Schaller also advised her that the dam on the Springvale property could remain, and that he was not aware of any problems caused by that dam. She was also advisedthat perhaps some of her flooding problems could be les- sened, but the flooding problems are basically caused from the property to the west of her property. J. Wixted moved to approve the proposal to install storm sewers, sanitary sewers, water lines, pavement and sidewalks throughout the Pebblebrook Subdivision and also approve the partial improvement of the existing Canterbury roadway and the replacement of the existing culvert as shown in the plans and to give final approval for the plat, the 59 lots, fronting on Pebblebrook Lane and Sandpiper Lane, seconded by E. Traczyk, and unanimously approved. At this point Mr. Yesberger asked to address the Commission and advised that in his conversations with the developers, he has requested a small portion of one of these lots on the south west corner of the subdi- vision in order to re-arrange the tee. He believes that he need$ a sturdy fence of at least 6 to 8 feet high. He also needs a small piece of land on the north west corner of the property which abuts into the golf course. He advised that he will be moving and replanting some trees and will have to plant some new ones. He stated that the devel- opers seem to be agreeable to his requests, but at this point he has nothing in writing. The Commission suggested that Mr. Yesberger discuss his concerns with the BZD Committee or• Council when proposal is presented to them. V e COMMiTNICATIONS : Memo from the Mayor asking that the Commission consider having signs placed in front of new structures advising who is moving into the building. Commission believes that there are enough signs in North Olmsted already. VI. NEW BUSINESS: Mr. Gorris asked Mr. Dubelko to give the Commission a synopsis of the decision pertaining to the Commission`s liability. Mr. Dubelko will provide this at the next meeting. Mr. Burns presented two proposed changes to the Planning Commission's By-laws. The Commission will study and vote on these at the next meeting. He also presented a Charter Amendment for the members to study. The Law Department will also review this_ VII. OLD BUSINESS: In reference to the Milton's North Coast Bistro plans, Mr. Bierman would Iike all plans to be accurate and complete, and questioned if there should be some change in the Ordinance or if this could just be a policy of the Building Commissioner.