04/03/1985 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

S BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS APRIL 3, 1985 PAGE 3 Department; that parking has not been reviewed by the Building Department; and that by ordinance a 7' green area is required along front property line. Mr. Scheeff of Springvale is also concerned about parking, but lias no objec- tion to the school; he also stated that other neighbors (not present) had no negative comments on the proposal. Many members of the audience spoke in favor of Mr. Kadar, his work with young people as a tennis coach, and'agreed that there was a need for the school. Chairman Remme-1 requested that this case be interupted so that tfie last.case could -be heard prior to any more discussion on this one. Mr. Kadar agreed. 5. Lenny W. Burkett, 4000 Canterbury Rd. Request for special permit to construct garage addition to non-conforming dwelling. Special permission required Ord. 62-33, Section 1231.02. Chairman Remmel called all interested parties before the Board. The oath was administered to Mr. Burkett. Chairman Remmel observed that this would seem to be a shed, not an addition to the garage. Addition will be built to match the existing garage. C. Remmel moved to grant the special permit for this 10' tiy 10' addition, providing it follows all building standards for the house (must have same siding, same type garage door, that is it must maintain the same type architecture), seconded by R. Bugala, and unan- imously approved. 4: Richard P. Kadar, 5870 Canterbury Rd. (Resumed at this point) Mr. Brennan, a real estate evaluator., who at one time studied the Springvale Country Club property for the City, gave a brief resume of his qualifications, and his findings in this study; he stated that use would be compatible to the adjacent uses, vacant property could not be developed residentially (par- king lots on two sides) and that two courts would not be a profit making situation. A letter from Mrs. Froelich; who owns a home on the street, was read stating that she had no objections to the proposal, but would like a fence around the property so that there is no trespassing on her land. Chairman Remmel announced that there would be a brief recess so that Board could caucus for five minutes. After a brief recess, meeting was reconvened. (Minutes are verbatim from-this point on.) (E. Graves) I move that we grant the request of Mr. Kadar t.o operate a tennis school at 5870 Canterbury Road, subject to the following conditions: 1) it be operated as non-profit and continue to operate as a non-prof it organization and any time that it stops to be operated that way, it ceases to do business; secondly, it must conform to all the codes, and approval by the Engineering Department for drainage and by conforming to all the codes that includes parking with ingress/egress, driveways plus the 7' green strip we require on the front on the Canterbury side of the property; thirdly, we want a 5' open type fence on the south side of the property which is the ravine side of the property to protect the safety of people there; and fourthly, our variance is contingent upon the approval of the Planning and Architectural Commissions. (Gomersall) I second that. (Bugala) Just a point of question, do we have to give them a variance on this, the 200' variance (Gareau) The variance on what? (Bugala) the 200 foot for tlie building and the 50 foot for the side parking or is that...(Gareau) Yes. (Bugala)...is that implied or should it be stated. (Gareau) It's not implied, it should be stated. (Remmel) Include that in.