09/10/1985 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 10, 1985 PAGE 6 R IV. NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: 1) Noreen Drive Subdivision -, Location is the southeast corner of the Walter Road and Noreen Drive intersection. Proposal is to subdivide and re-align two (2) parcels 231-1-6 and 231-1-112, into three (3) parcels. Note: Proposed sublot No. 1 does not conform to minimum depth requirement (135 ft.) and sublot No. 2 does not conform to the minimum frontage requirement for a corner lot (75 ft.) City Engineer J. Schaller explained that subdivision would have to receive variances from the Board of Zoning Appeals since two of the three lott)will be non-conforming: sublot 1 is not the required 135' deep and sublot 2 does not conform to the corner lot requirement, all lots exceed the mini- mum square foot requirement, and sublot 3 will conform. Miss Valore, the owner, explained that the adjacent lots on Noreen are the same depth. Neighbors; P. Golden, R. Dietrick, and R. Denk objected to the proposal: a similar request had been turned down several years before, they did not want their houses facing-the side and liack yard of the house on the corner; and they believe that.other variances will be required in order to build homes.on the vacant parcels. The Commission pointed out that frequently houses:face the side and rear yard•of-a house on a corner lot. Mr. Burns stated that since the lots basically conform to the others in the neighborhood, he does not believe that it would create a hardship to the other lots in the neighborhoode Proposal must be referred to the Board of Zoning Appeals who may or may not grant the variance. J. Burns moved to forward the Walter Road/Noreen Drive Subdivision to the Board of Zoning Appeals for their consideration with the recommendation that the variances be granted because all three lots will conform as to minimum square footage, the variance requested on lot 2 is for three and a third feet which requires a variance because it becomes a corner lot'and under normal circumstances being a non-corner lot it would require 60' frontage and on sublot 1 the depth which is being requiested will match the depths of the adjoining lots on Noreen Dr., seconded by T. Morgan and unanimously approved. 2) Robert and Eileen Brennan Subdivision - Location is the south side of Mastick Road, west of Park Lane. Proposal is to subdivide parcel 237-24-6 into two (2) parcels. Note: that the parcel now has two (2) residential dwellings (addresses:24193 and 24207 Mastick Road. Frontage variance obtained June 12, 1985. Vari- ance still required for minimum lot depth and lot area. City Engineer Schaller explained that there presently are two houses on one lot. Subdivision was erroneously referred to Board of Zoning Appeals, where a variance was granted for the frontage of the lots. Under a new ordinance, this subdivision should have been sent to Planning Commission for referral to the Board of Zoning Appeals. Vairances are also required for the depth of the lots and for the square footage. It'was noted that sublot 2 would conform to the depth requirement if it were figured on the average. Mr. Brennan pointed out that at one time these were two lotE and they were combined, that the lots back up to the valley and that none of the lots on this section of Mastick Road conform to todays ordinances. J. Burns moved to refer the Robert Br.ennan-Subdivision to the Board of Zoning Appeals with the recommendation that the variances for frontage,