Laserfiche WebLink
<br />BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS FEBRUARY 1, 1984 . PAGE 2 <br />1133.07.and that a request for a speeial ruling would be covered under <br />Section 1133.11 and would be used to determine whether a use in a specific <br />district would be considered a permitted use. These have been confused in <br />the past. He also stated that the Great Northern case was really not pro- <br />perly before the Board because they were not adversly affected by a ruling <br />of the Building Commissioner. <br />Chairman Remmel read a letter from Building Commissioner Gundy regarding <br />the Hart case heard January 4, 1984, advising that on January 12, 1984 the <br />Engineering Department measured the rear yard and that the variance granted <br />was adequate for the structure in the rear yard set back. <br />A letter from the Interim City Engineer, Robert Falardeau, to Planning <br />Commission (with a copy to this Board) requesting relief from the require- <br />ment of using 8 inch house connedtion as contained in Section 1000.10 (B) <br />(2). This is not a matter for this Board. Mr. Gareau advised that there <br />are provisions in the Platting and Engineering Codes to cover such a situa- <br />tion. <br />Chairman Remmel mentioned that when applicants for the Board are being con- <br />sidered, there should be a requirement that they be homeowners and tax <br />payers in the City. Mr. Gareau said that, by charter, this could not be a <br />condition, only that the members be residents of the City. Mr. Remmel <br />believes that prospective members should be made aware that all members <br />make a site inspection of each case and that there is no reimbursement for <br />gas. <br />Meeting was adjourned at 7:50 p.m. <br />, ?.;. <br />Ott <br />C. Remiuel, Chairman <br />B. Oring, R <br />rding Secretary