Laserfiche WebLink
. <br />? <br />CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MINUTES - NOVEMBER 27, 1984 __ <br />I. ROLL CALL: <br />Chairman Morgan called the meeting to order at 8:00 p.m. <br />Present: J. Burns, B. Gorris, E. Traczyk, J. Wixted, J. Brown, and <br />T. Morgan. <br />Also Present: Building Commissioner E. Gundy, Assistant Law Director J. <br />Dubelko, City Engineer J. Schaller and Recording Secretary <br />B. Oring. <br />II. REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF MINUTES: <br />J. Brown moved to approve the Minutes of November 13, 1984 as submitted, <br />seconded by E. Traczyk, and unanimously approved. <br />III. BUILDING DEPARTMENT REOUESTS: <br />1) Amber Oaks Subdivision, Woodside Dr. and Deepwoods Way. <br />Proposal to install two signs in public right-of-way on Woodside Dr. <br />near intersection of k'alter Rd. and near intersection of Gessner Rd. <br />Building Comnissioner Gundy presented proposal to place two 4' by 3' <br />permanent development signs between the curb and the sidewalk on Woodside <br />Dr., one near Walter Road and one near Gessner Road. Mrs. V. Polito <br />explained proposal: signs will be 6' to 8' high; sign near Walter is pro- <br />posed for north east corner; sign near Gessner will be on south east <br />corner. Mr. Tuma of 24249 Gessner and M. Cabot of 4033 Walter were con- <br />cerned that signs might block view (after seeing proposal they had no <br />objections). Letter from Frederick Bower, Shore West Construction, sug- <br />gested that sign near Walter Rd. be moved across the street to the south <br />east corner where there is a buffer (block "A") between sidewalk and a- <br />jacent lot and also because the sublot on the north east corner is not <br />developed, tlie sign could be damaged during construction and also that <br />the future owner would have sign in front yard (sign on other side <br />would be adjacent to the side yard of house facing Walter). Mrs. Polito <br />believes that sign would look better at proposed location since it is <br />part of the development and location on opposite side of street is ad- <br />jacent to a older home facing Walter Rd. Assistant Law Director Dubelko <br />requested that the Commission table proposal so that the Law Department <br />can research the City's liability since sign is on the public right-of- <br />way.' He would also like proposal referred to the Safety Department. <br />J. Burns moved to refer the Amber Oaks Subdivision proposal to install <br />two signs in the public right-of-way to the Law Department and to the <br />Safety Department for their input, seconded by T. Morgan, and unanimously <br />approved.