03/23/1982 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

l 1 . PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 23, 1982 PAGE 2 and 2 had been ammended by the Review Board to shorten the overhang of the roof instead of bringing out the concrete curbing and the window in order to prevent large vehicles from hitting the overhang. He agreed that he would modify the plans so that high vehicles would not be a problem. In reference to #2 Spudnuts has agreed to the exit and entrance signs on the driveways, however the "exit only" sign on Whitethorn will not be lighted (there was no recommendation for lighting these signs by the Review Board). Regarding the 7th stipulation, Mre Leonard stated that he had plarined to prepare and paint the rear wall to match the stucco board and the trim but that the cost of finishing the rear wall with the stucco and cedar would be prohibitive. He also pointed out that the high shrubs would help conceal this wall. He cannot positively guarantee that the metal paint would not peel, but since this store will be a proto-type for other stores which will be built in this area, he is certain that Spudnuts will maintain the property. Mr. Prokasy observed that this is leased property and that Spudnuts was renovating it wo that it would be a great im- provement over the present building which is unoccupied and deteriorating and that the cost is a consideration. As for the 9th recommendation, Mr. Leonard stated that the roof would be elevated on three sides so that the mechanical equipment would not be totally exposed. He planned to paint them to match the roof, and did not think they would be noticeable. J. Prokasy moved to approve the Spudnuts, Inc. proposal with the March 15, 1982 recoinmendations of the Architectural Board of Review numbers 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8, and with the notation that the overhang of the roof could be shortened 1 foot. In reference to recommendation #7 we concur with Mr. Leonard, the Architect, that_the rear wa11 can be prepared and repainted with metal paint and concealed with shrubs and that also we recommend that recommendation #9 referring to the mechanical equipment on the roof, that this equipment can be painted to match the roof so as not to be too noticeable, seconded by J. Burns. Roll call on motion: Prokasy,.Burns, Brown, and Gorris, Aye. Perla, Nay. Motion- passed. Assistant City Engineer D. McDermott stated that since this property has not been assembled, the Engineering Department would delay its approvals until the assembly plat is submitted by the owner of the property, and also that the City is requesting that a small portion of the land be dedi- cated to the City for right-of-way at the intersection of Whitethorn and Lorain. He also pointed out that there was an error in the original survey. These matters must be handled by the owner of the property,.not Spudnuts. J. Prokasy moved that also in reference to Spudnuts, it be brought to the attention-of City Council that the Engineering Department requires the assembly of the 2 lots and is re- questing additional right-of-way on the south west corner of the site, seconded by R. Perla, and unanimously approved.