10/12/1982 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 12, 1982 PAGE 2 Ord. 82-124: This ordinance will simplify the approval procedures for replacement signs. Any square or rectangular replacement sign could be installed with approval from the Building Commissioner. It was suggested that perhaps round or oval signs should also be included, and also, that the Building Commissioner can, if he so chooses, forward any replacement. sign to the;:.Architectural Board of Review, Planning Commission and Council for approval. Also, in reference to the section pertaining to the removal of signs:which are in disrepair, there should be provisions made for enforcement; such as fines levied against the owner of the sign or a budget set up for the removal. It was agreed to forward this Ordinance tb the Architectural Board of Review so that they could study and make their recommendations directly to the BZD Committee. T. Morgan moved to recommend approval of Ord. 82-124 with the above recommendations and to refer the Ordinance to the Architectural Board for their comments.which are to be forwarded directly to the BZD Committee, seconded by J. Burns, and unanimously approved. Ord. 82-116: This Ordinance is to set standards for industrial parks in Limited Industrial areas. Mr. Woerpel's letter advised the Commission that perhaps the 200' frontage and the 2.acre minimum lot size required in the Ordinance should be.reduced to 100' frontage and 1 acre minimum. The Commission agreed. Other comments were that 10 acres which is the minimum stated is too small for an indus- trial park and that the required buffer areas should only pertain wtExethe industrial park abuts residential property. Mr. Burns had many questions and comments on various sections: some he be- lieved should be clarified, some which could be too restrictive, and some which could be considered unnecessary; and also, the rear yard regulations are not included in the chapter which is so titled. Mr. Goldberg of Sunrise Development also believes that the 2 acre parcel could be too restrictive for smaller companies; that the buffer strips were not necessary except when abutting residential areas; that some of the Sections did not address the issues as stated in the title..He pointed out that if the minimum lot size is reduced, the minimum side yards requirements would have to be revised as well. He has no problem with the set backs and required rear yard parking. The Commission agreed that it would be best to discuss this with Council members Woerpel and Petrigac. T.. Morgan moved that O.rd. 82-116 continue to be tabled and ask for an extention of time from Council to consider the Ordinance further and that the principals, D. Woerpel and Y. Petrigac, be invited to the next Planning Commission meeting to discuss the Commission's comments and recommendations, seconded by J. Roberts, and unanimously approved. VII. NEW BUSINESS: North Olmsted City Complex, located at the rear of the now existing 5206 Dover Center Rd. To be presented by Mayor Swietyniowski