08/18/1982 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

T <WiPh?Sie:J?..,s. -?+:<r..,, .?a...k?dv?em.c,:n';.,dd??:Ct,. •w....e.,..ew-?..=?ca'.4..,t,[......b?s:....«;.n.....:;+?s. ?__.:.c-?:_'c;:.:;.si.,... .:..v ..d,:'..t.9..?r;,?.a.,.??,<ttHma.4c:6k:J.F?.'"?ss$t4'""'r?ao-..?"'?trBS'.rex':=T&?LXtT?a'ss$°?^.«fi:v'n`ais_?Y'4a.'.'&.:a:w:i.'7'w.x:.?1-.._,?..?:A:Yi: ARCHITECTURAL BOARD OF REVIEW AUGUST 18, 1982 PAGE 2 the pole sign be brought in from underground not from over- head. The Board believed that tliere was an existing pole sign on the property and would like the Building Department to check into it. IV. OLD BUSINESS: (a) William Given Warehouse, 30948 Bradley Rd. (Tabled July 21, 1982) Proposal to construct warehouse in Limited Industry Area. Lxhiblts: Delivered for July Meeting Heard by Planning Commission July 27, 1982. Mr. Given explained that he had originally planned to have a concrete block building, however, concrete block is not an approved material for exterior walls and the Board of Building Code Appeals had recommended using Svet split block. Be- cause of the additional expense of the split block, Mr. Given now plans to cover the block with Texture 111 vertical siding with horizontal lap siding on the gables; 2` of the concrete will be exposed'at the foundation. His plans do not reflect these changes and there is no color rendering of the building. The Board would prefer that the block not be exposed at the foundation. After a brief discussion, M. Case moved to ap- prove the Given Warehouse plans as explained by Mr. Given: The building will be concrete block, covered with texture 111 in dark brown, with horizontal lap siding on the gabled ends, and horizontal trim boards at the top, at the middle seam, at the bottom, and at the corners; 2' of the concrete block will be exposed at the foundation and will be painted to match the hui l.(l [.n};, tlie two c>verheacl door5 and the two pedestrian doors will be dark brown; rind Uie, cl.n'lc l)rOwn f;uLLur.S wil.L I)e. p.Lauud on a minimum 6" facia board (with proper slope), seconded by R. Parry, and unanimously approved. R. Parry moved that the applicant prepare detailed exterior elevation drawings of the building as approved by the Board and submit it to the Plan- ning Commission for their September meeting and also, one copy be provided for the Architectural Board of Review's next meeting for information only, seconded by S. Ebin, and unani- mously approved. V. NEW BUSINESS: (a) Heyduk Florists, 25024 Lorain Rd. Proppsal for addition and alteration Exhibits: Delivered Heard by Planning Commission July 27, 1982 Mrs. Zmich and Ed Heyduk, Jr. presented the plans and materials. Part of the existing canopy will be removed and the remainder will be altered. The building will have a rustic appearance