Laserfiche WebLink
? <br /> <br />ARCHITECTURAL BOARD OF REVIEW APRIL 21, 1980 PAGE 4 <br />entire front of the b uilding. The architectural detail <br />could then be at the corners instead of the front of the <br />building. There should be places for bike racks on both sides <br />of the b uilding. It was suggested that the dumpster be re- <br />located to the north westcornerand the drive behind the <br />building be eliminated. The parking lot should be redesigned <br />and splayed. Ther exterior lighting will be sodium lights <br />directed down toward the parking area. These lights could be <br />shaded if they shine off the property. R. Parry moved to <br />reserve final approval of the Architectural details and make <br />the following recommendations: <br />1. Redesign the portico and extend the canopy along the <br />entire east side of the building, with corner porticos <br />on both the north east and south east building corners. <br />2. Widen the sidewalk along the east side of the building <br />to either match the canopy to be approximately 6' to <br />8' wide and wrap around the north east and south east <br />corners. <br />3. Put parking islands or stripe the end of parking isles <br />adjacent to the building, splay any of the curbs into <br />the last parking space wherever that occurs. <br />4. Remove the driveway behind the building and locate <br />dumpster and screening. of the dumpster. <br />5. Provide bikeracks at either end of building. <br />6. Provi.de a final landscape plan including potential <br />alternates to any exis ting trees that may die during <br />construction. 0 <br />7. Resubmit the final plans to indicate how canopy is to <br />be designed. <br />8. Submit signage plan. <br />Seconded by D. Williams. C. Petroski abstained. <br />VI. ADJOURNMENT : <br />The inee ting was adj ourned at 9: 45 p. m. <br />R. P arry, Chairman <br />B. Oring, Recording Secretary