Laserfiche WebLink
I ? <br />{ <br />BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS DECEMBER 3, 1980 PAGE 3 <br />8. Yong H. Jung (Impact Signs), 25566 Lorain Rd. <br />Request for variance (1133.13). Request variance to replace face on <br />existing non-conforming (location) pole sign. Violation of Ord. <br />62-33, Section 1221.06 F-4. <br />Chairman Ledvina called all interested parties before the Board. -The <br />oath was administered. Bill Aftora of Impact signs stated that this <br />was for a new business. C. Remmel moved to reject the variance, <br />seconded by E. DeVoto, and unanimously approved. Request denied. <br />9. Northeast Appliance & Audio (Boyer Sign Co.), 4608 Great Northern Blvd. <br />Withdrawn by Building Department; sign illegally installed. <br />At this point Building Commissioner Gundy requested an interpretation <br />from the Board on non-conforming signs dealing with altering, moving, <br />and maintaining said signs. He is now questioning if changing the face of a sign is in violation of Section _1231.03 D, Non-Conforming ? <br />Signs, and also Section 1125.04. The Board discussed these Sections. ? <br />E. DeVoto moved that the ruling of the Board of Zoning Appeals is <br />that a replacement of a face on a sign by the existing user will be <br />construed to be in the'nature of a repair and will not be considered <br />subject to a variance; the replacement of a face by a new user will <br />be considered a change to the structure of the sign, and will be <br />subject to the provisions of the Ordinance, seconded by L. Horvath, <br />and unanimously approved. <br />The meeting was adjourned at 9:15 p.m. <br />.. ? <br />D. Ledvina, Chainnan B. Oring, <br />rding Secretary