01/08/1980 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

i PLANNING CONIrffSSION JANUARY 8, 1980 PAGE 2 NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: " 3. (Heard first) Westmark Development Co. Resubdivision of Sublots 20 and 21 (Permanent Parcel Nos. 231-27-51 and 52) of the Westmark Developments Co Subdivision No. 1, approved by the North Olmsted Coimcil Resolution No. 78-4. Located east of Walter Road and south of Gessner Rd. Assistant City Engineer D. McDermott introduced the plans which involve only moving of a property line 2' south and explained that this was reqiiested by the Engineering Department. The lots involved still conform to all Ordinances. J. Roberts moved to approve the Westmark Development Co. Resubdivision, seconded by B. Gorris, and tmanimously approved. 1. 7515 Compnay's Subdivision No. 1 Preliminary Plan to sub- divide existing Parcel 231-19-5 into four (4) sublots: three (3) sublots front on Columbia Road and one (1) fronts on Walter Road9 with a large remonant "Block A" between the proposed sublots. The existing parcel has frontage on both Colimmbia and Walter Road and is located north of Gessner Road and south of Antler Drive. 2. 7515 Company's Subdivision No. 2. Preliminary Plan to sub- divide "Block A" of 7515 Company's Subdivision No. 1, listed above, into fifty (50) sublots, and includes ex- tension and connection of Dawn Drive and Htmter Drive. Assistant City Engineer D. McDermott explained that the above items could have been one plan but the developer pre- ferred -to have them subdivided separately. , The developer, Dick MacKay, explained that he intends to sell Subdivision #1 first and then develop Subdivisian #2 at a later date. Block A will not be landlocked and all sublots conform to Ordinance. The plans were studied and discussed. There is one exd.sting house on sublot 1 and greenhouses on sublot 1 and 2. The greenhouses are to be torn down. The ad- joining property owners were called before the Comnission. 'They were concerned that the flooding and drainage problems that they have now will be increased with the development of this land. Mr. Prokasy explained that in the last few years, developers are required by Ordinance., to retain run- off water in an imderground retention basin basin and the water cannot be allowed to run off the property at a faster rate than before the area was developed. Council President D. Limpert questioned how the retension basin worked with a larger pipe going into a smaller pipeo Assistant Engineer D. McDermott explained that the water was held back and was released slowly into the smaller pipe. Zt was also explained that no rum-off water will be diverted to the existing ditches in the neighborhood and that there will be no open ditches in the development. A11 utility wires will be