My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/22/1980 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1980
>
1980 Planning Commission
>
01/22/1980 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:35:03 PM
Creation date
1/30/2019 8:34:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1980
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
1/22/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />r? • <br />CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />• PLANNING CONINffSSION <br />N1TAI.UTES - JANUARY 22, 1980 <br />I. ROLL CALL: <br />Present: B. Gorris, T. Morgan, R. Perla, J. Prokasy, J. Roberts, <br />J. Brown and R. Bugala. <br />. Also Present: Assistant Law birector D. Ryan, Building Commissioner <br />E. Gundy, Ass?istant City Engineer D. McDermott, <br />Councilman R. Wilamosky, and Recording Secretary <br />B. Oring. <br />II, REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF 24INUTES: <br />J. Roberts moved to approve the Minutes of December 11, 1979 as <br />submitted, seconded by J. Brown, and unanimously approved. <br />J. Brown moved to approve the Minutes of January 8, 1980 as <br />submitted, seconded by B. Gorris, and unanimously approved. <br />IIIa BUILDING DEPARTMENT REQUESTS: <br />The Planning Commission studied and discussed the signs in con- <br />junction with the Architectural Board of Review Minutes of <br />January 219 1980. <br />J. Prokasy moved to approve the proposals as presented and as rec- <br />ommended by the Architectural Board of Review; the Olmsted Plaza -' <br />Phase 4-B Marjack Development sign criteria and the LaValle's <br />Restaurant sign, seconded by J. Roberts, and tmanimously approved. <br />At this point there was a discussion of the time allotted for the <br />Architectural Board of Review to act on proposals. The Waxnan <br />Cappet Warehouse Sign had been continued twice by the Review <br />Board. Z-t was explained by Assistant Law Director D. Ryan that <br />by Ordinance the Architectural B.oard of Review is required to make <br />recommendations to Planning Commission within 30 days si-nce <br />Planning Commission has to act on the proposal within 60 days. <br />Planning Commission can, if the developer is agreeable, place a <br />proposal in committee prior to making final recomnendations to <br />Council. If Planning Commission fails to act the within the 60 <br />day limitation and the Developer has not agreed to a continuance, <br />Council must assume that the Planning Commission has approved the <br />proposal. It was then determined that the Planning Commission is <br />required to act on the sign for Waxnan's Carpet Warehouse signs. <br />B. Gorris moved to approve the Waxman's Carpet Warehouse Signs, <br />seconded by J. Prokasy, and unanimously approved. -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.