Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br />PLAIVNING COMrffSSION tIARCH 11, 1980 PAGE 2 <br />(c) Minotti's Drive Thru Beverage, 27100 Lorain Rdo <br />Proposed addition and alteration to existing abendoned <br />auto wash. <br />Mr. Gundy introduced the proposal and explained the plans. <br />This is basically a drive thru beverage store with little <br />pedestrian traffic. The car 6aash will be rebuilt and will operate <br />in conjunction with the beverage store. Because of the traffic <br />conjection at Dover Center aad Lorain Roads, Chairman Bugala stated <br />that he would prefer that this proposal be studied by the Safety <br />Director prior to any action by the Commission. R. Perla moved <br />to table Minotti's Drive Thru Beverage plans until a report is <br />received from the Safety Director, seconded by B. Gorris, and <br />unanimous ly app rove d. <br />(d)- North Olmsted United Methodist Church, 4600 Dover Center -Rd. <br />Proposal to add a community facility to= an existing ehurch.. <br />Mr. Thomas Moore, Architect, explained that the addition would <br />provide a'more conventional roof structure which will be seen from <br />the street. Also, that a parking lot with 52 spaces (47 are re- <br />quired) will be paved and drainage will be provided. Secretary <br />J. Brown read a letter from P"'?r. & Mrs. Andrew J. Szaniszlo, <br />27319 Benwood Circle, expressing their concers about the p roposal. <br />They stated no objection to the addition to the church, however <br />they are concerned about the northward expansion of the parking <br />- lot. The concerns s-tated were: 1) Water -runoff from the parking. <br />lot`:to the =open..drainage basi_n and into a 36 inch pipe (a ra.ised <br />, aspfialted lip. on the nor-thern edge of -the .parking_lot =was sug- <br />gested as a preventative- measure), 2) -The open-r water=runoff re- <br />tention basin containing stag;aant wa-ter is -an attractive nuisance <br />and a health hazard 3) A paved parking-lot will further jeopar- <br />dize the security of the homes on the south of Benwood, since cars <br />are parking there late at night and people are using the lot for <br />access to the b ack of prope rty on Benwood (A gate is suggested as <br />a solution) 4) A paved parking lot will attract mini-bikes and <br />children on bikes (again a gate is sugges ted) 5) That the solid <br />hedge required by the Board of Zoning Appeals, March 5, 1980, <br />will not eliminate the eyesore since the parking lot will extend <br />too far north to allow suceessful planting of such a hedge and <br />that water-runoff could droc.n the hedge and eliminate the re- <br />quired screening (an esthetically pleasing fence, not chain link, <br />would be more satisfactory and would prevent a precedent for a <br />future westward parking lot expansion into the wooded area behind <br />the other southern residences on Benwood Circle). In response to <br />the state-ment that "In May, 1978, the church requested..a deviation <br />from code from the Board of Zoning Appeals...", Chairman Bugala <br />explained that a church was a permitted use in a residential dis- <br />trict and that the requirement of a special permit is the method <br />by which the City controls tlze building and expansion of any church.