11/19/1979 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARCHITECTURAL BOARD OF REVIEW NOVEMBER 19, 1979 PAGE 2 They are considering using utility size brick with colored grout (brown Tiolly), all earth tones will be used, there will be a fiberglass timberline roof (poly-cedar blend - 315), wood will be rough sawn cedar (texture 111) stained with earth tone, poly-saridstone trim on garages. The developers and the Board agreed Qn several points: 1).trash_con- tainers, not located on plans will be screened. 2)wate=r?and electric meters, not shown on the plans, will be placed in garages or at end of units, 3) roof vents have no closures needs flashing, 4) down- spouts not shown on plan will be heavy commercial gttuge aluminum (baked enamel in earth tones) 5) Air conditions are to be mounted on pads and placed as far away from bedroom windows as possible and vented so as not to harm foliage, 6) gas meters will be grouped with air conditioners 7) Garage closes_t to building will be extended out an additional foot or garage doors will be reversed so that larger door is closer to b uilding rather than single door to expand some of b ack out areas. 8) Fast growing evergreens or higher trees should be added to landscape plan (mostly flowering bushes) to screen upper windows along 1480 and that as many natural trees as possible will be left on property 9) if mail chutes cannot be used design outside mail boxes, 10) Development sign to be designed 11) Lighting plan will be submitted at a later date. The neighbors present are very much interested in having b.he devel- opment fenced and were advised to check with the Planning Commission. R. Parry moved to approve the plans and requested the subznission. ?. of a lighting plan, the design of the sign, location of electric an&,:water meters, location of trash pads, design of outside mail- boxes if needed, that a flashing cover over chimney flue vent be included, show color, type of downspouts and gutters(heavy gauge aluminum), expand some of the back_out area for garage closest to building, driveways are to be hard-surfaced, seconded by C. Petroski, and unanimously app roved. (b) A A R Office Building, 26127 Lorain Rdo Revised plans (original plans approved September 17, 1979) - William Hallasz presented the revised p lans. He explained that A A R Corporation wanted to cut b ack on the project and, also, there is a problem getting the Dryvit material and also in applying it in below 45 or 50 degree weather. The drive-under canopy will be part of Phase 2. They haVe now de- signed a masonery building (split block) with steel above the window heads. The present canopy will be exterior plywood or panel 15 (aluminium faced plywood) The old brick on the existing building will be painted to match the split block. C. Petroski suggested usingstucco over the existing brick or at least an expoxy coating with a guarantee. C. Petroski moved to approve the split face brick in place of the Dryvit material on the new building arnd tYie eanopy ':usi.ng-an aluminum faced ply}:aoo:d and'approve ?the painting`of the -