Laserfiche WebLink
? <br />r' <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 13, 1979 PAGE 2 <br />property. Discussion ensued. The neighbors also brought up <br />traffic problems which already exist and will be compounded.by <br />the additional traffic created by the proposed subdivision.. They <br />were advised by Chairman Bugala to take up these problems again <br />with the Safety Director in order to get a light at tidalter and <br />Lorain Roads. The owner of the property next to sublot 45 claimed <br />that his survey stakes had been removed from his property <br />line, and that this property was encroaching 12 inches onto his <br />land. Mr. Andreano proroised a certified survey of the property to <br />determine the correct boLmdries of the lot. The neighbors were <br />advised that this subdivision would be brought back before the <br />Planning Commission at the April lOth meeting and that they would <br />not be notified of this meeting. <br />COMMUNICATIONS• <br />No Items <br />NEW BUSINESS• <br />No Items <br />OLD BUSINESS• <br />No Items <br />COMMITTEE REPORTS: <br />Mr. Ryan moved to take out of comnittee the suggested B.oarfl Guide- <br />lines for Submittal, prepared by Mr. D. Williams, and submitted by <br />the Architectural Review Board (Item IV of Architectural Review <br />Board minutes of Feb ruary 19, 1979, specifically Sections 1 and 3 <br />of the Submission Guidelines). Seconded by J. Brown and unanimously <br />approved. Mr..Bugala distributed copies of the Ordinance which <br />orginally created the Architectural Review Board, and the authority <br />it was delegated. A lengthy discussion then ensued as to proceedure <br />to be` followed by the Architectural Review Board, length of time <br />necessary for study and approval of plans, and the necessity for <br />such guidelines. The Coirunission concurred that further study was ' <br />needed and that a joint meeting of the Architectural Review Board <br />and Planning Coffinission would be desireable. D. Ryan moved to return <br />the sugoested Board Guidelines for Sub mittal (Item IV of Archi- <br />tectural Review Board minutes of February 19, 1979) to committee <br />for further study, seconded by B. Gorris, and unanimously approved. <br />Bikeways Committee: Mr. Ohman advised that there would be a re- <br />port at the next meeting.