09/01/1976 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Board of Zoning Appeals 9s-1" 7 6 -?. - fer requirement shall be reduced to 20 f.te as relates to con- tiguous residential property and (2) The requirement of 16 u- nits per acre or a maximurii of 248 suites of garden type plus 70 suitess in the six story building.) Mr. Hamill seconded and motion passeda 12. Virgel R. Zanick, 4242 Clague Rd.. Request for variance (1133•13)• Re- quest for special permission to add to non-conforming dwelling (100 ft. front setback). apecial permission required by Ord. 62 33 Section 1163. Ol. Present: Mr. Zanik who was administered theoath. Case and appeal were read. Plans were examined. After short discussion Mr. Hami11 moved to grant special permission to add to non-conforming dweZ- ling as per plans. N1r. Duskey seconded and motion passed. 13.. Thomas Stemmer, 29930 Lorain Rd. Request for variance (1133•13)• Request for 65 ft. variance for frontage. Violation of Ord.62-33 Section 117L•07 requiring 150 ft. frontage in RetaiJ. Business District. Present: r1r. Stemmer and Mrs. Zipp who were administered the oath. Case and appeal were read. 150 ft. frontage has been required by ordi- nance since 1969.. Chairman Ledvina gave brief background on the 150 ft. requirement. There is body shop on the premises. The Johnson Doolittl.e subdivision before Council was brought to the attention of Board members by Law Director Gareau. There was dis- cussion of rulings regarding frontage and intent of the ordinance.. NIr. Duskey moved to grant request for 65 ft. variance for frontage. Ntr. Hamill seconded the motion.Roll Cal.l on the motian: Aye - Mr. Hamill and Mr. I3uskey. Nay - Mre Ledvina. Motion failed to pass. Request c3enied.- 1.14.. Jack OtConnel, Strype Kleen, 15h Z^'oodbury Street, Elyria, Ohio 4h035. Re- quest for variance (1133•13)• Request to use property at 5359 Decker Rd. for a furniture refinishing businesso' Violation of Ord. 62-33 Section 1141.05. (Single Residential Distr:?ct). Present: Ntr. 0°Connel who was administered the oath... Case and anpeal were read. Appellant does not own the propert.y, has it on contingency basis. Plan is to convert from dry cleaning and tailor shop. Further discussion concerned previous uses, em- ployees? fencing and the fact that this i.s not a permitted use in residential district.. Mr. Hamill moved to deny the request for variance. Mr. Duske.y seconded and motion passed. 15. John A,.,Horchy, 3826 Dover Rd.-. Request for variance (1133.13)• Request for 2 ft. variance for fence height. Violation of Ord. 62-33 Section 1151... 04 (H). Presento 14r.'Hvrchy who -was administered the oath... Case and appeal were read. Mr..Gundy explained the plan - from 30 in. to 6 ft. for fence:,. Entire rear yard to have 6 ft. fence to complement city fence (6 ft..high fence to enclose culvert).. There was discus- sion of height of fence, type and need and approximate date swim-