04/22/1975 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e. • Planning Commission 4-22-75 - 2 - Mr. Prokasy said variance has been approved for 20 ft. at Board of Zoning Appeals meeting April 2 as follows: 11Mr. Tubbs moved to ` grant 20 ft. variance as request requires; the 50 ft. adjacent to the residential area is to be landscaped; landscaping maintained and no structures to be built ther,eon". Mr. Prokasy stated that makes it a condition of the variance. A member of the atzdience asked if they are to be condominiums and for sale. She was answered in the affixmative. 5he also asked about the undedicated street; if buyers w ill be aware of same; what about gar- bage collection. Mr. Mcl?ermott referred to notation Engineering Dept. will require. Height of buildings was then discussed. They are to be about 35 ft. - two story. There was question of storage of equipment for maintda- ance of buildings and grounds. xt was discussed that one garage is usual.ly used. Mr. Prokasy explained these are a set of building plans, basically for a project to contain 9 buildingso Current project has been reduced to 7 buildings, Mr. Prokasy and Mr. Clingman worked togethex to corre- late the numbers from 1 thx°ough 9 when there are only 7. Developer states the buildings are the same with the exception of the exterior elevation. (They worked to have the numbers 1 through 7 in sequence) Mr. Fiokasy then submitted to Commission members who reviewed exterior elevation and fl.oor plans. Mr. Prokasy explained what he had been working on - because of the reduction in number of buildings - changed the numbers of the plans to coincide with the numbers on the site plans. Square footage, parking spaces,exits and units were discussed. Mro Prokasy addressed Mr. Clingman stating another question had arisen on the site plan; specifically two parking spaces relating to some of the maneuvering out of the spaces; he questioned sw3nging of these two spaces to another location on site p1an. &. Clingman said there,is not any problem and detailed another way to place the spaces. Mr0 Gundy was aked to review and saw no problem in moving these tVio spaces. Drainage and retention basin were discussed. Mr. Prokasy stated En- gineering Department determines the standards; final improvement plans will be reviewed by Planning Commission. Mr. Freeh moved that the site plans be approved as submitted with the three revisions: (1) two parking spaces to be located north and south parallel to south garage of Building No., 6; (2) outside radius of the paved circl.e to be recorded at 60 ft. instead of !t.". ft.; (3) the drive area that is a.mmediately north of the north garage of Building #6 - that paved area be 24 ft. to a11ow sufficient room for cars to back out of that garage; and note per.taining to dedication of streets as shown on the record print; and that the buildings numbered 1 through 7 shall be the type buildings as shown on the last set of bui3.ding plans numbered 1 through 7; and subject to underground/covered re- tention basin by the Engineering Department. Motion was seconded by Mr. Rafeld and passed unanimously. Mr. McDermott reiterated im- portance of noting as far as driveways, etc. will not be eligible for dedicati,on and this must be made a public disclosure.