04/22/1975 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

v Planning Commission 4-22-75 - 5 - partment review of covered underground retention sy-stemo It to be noted in the minutes that Mr. Gi.bson has agreed to come in with the proposal at Commission's next meeting. Motion was seconded by Mro Roberts and passed,unanimously. (3) Pizza Hut at Gessner &Lara3n (formerly gas station) (southwest corner ) Item was previously approved by Zoni.ng Board of Appeals for some vari- ances and plan tonight depi.cts the variances the Board did grant. h2 parking spaces are required because there are Sh seats in the restau- rant. Board did vary the requirements by two and they are using only one of the variances;,also on Gessner Rd, the Board said they could e- liminate the planting strip. Mr. Mcpermott said there are two parcels and suhdivision i.s needed. The combined two lots have less than mini- mum requirement. Fence and lights were discussed. Commission doEs have right to request some form of screening, landscaping? etc. Con- cern was expressed with parka.ng spots. There are two houses directly across the street, headlights would be facing directly into those houses. A four ft. high fence down that street would be too highe Lighting was discussed. EZevation of parking lot compared to street elevation was discussed. Mr. Prokasy mentioned committee work is be- ing done on the floor of the P3anning Commission. Plans were review- ed again. Mr. Freeh moved request for Pizza Hut at Lorain and Gessner be referred to Committee, seconded by Mr. Tischler and approved. (4) Renovation of existing Car Wash at Bailey and Lorain Mr. Gundy presented plans of proposal to change the occupancy to E- lectrical Fixture Retail Sales Store. N1r. Weiss was present. Pl.ans were reviewed. Some 2000 sq. ft. of building area is on south side of Lorain. Developer is providing 17 aff street parking spaces; re- quirement is 10. ihere was discussion of removal of tanks. Mr. Tischler objects to parallel parking.. Mr. Roberts said parking would be very diffictzlt in front of the building; he would recommend no parking in front of the building. Some of the parallel parking spaces could be elimi.nated and there sti11 would be the 10 as requir- ed. Fence needs repa3.r. Mr. McDermott has not seen the plans; En- gineering Depaxtment would like to review them. Discussion continued regarding fence, landscaping, parking spaces. Also discussed were re- tention basin, drainage, grading, etc. Mr. Weiss said pavingi etc.is not going to be changed, only the use of the building. Traffic cir- culation was discussed. Mro Rafeld moved to refer proposal back to Committee and the developer resubmit drawing showing various changes, dimensions, curb cuts. N1r. Roberts seconded the motion. Motion pass- ed unanimously. Ntr. Prokasy reiterated changes - elimination of para- llel parking spaces; relocate 3 head in parking spaces; entire east side of the bui.lding to be landscaped; eliminate the fence - the gate fence between the back of the rear that blocks the entrance into Bailey; show property deimension itself; and also aware of desired changes in the existing fence in back property. N. V. Old Business - N'o Items New Developments and Subdivisions -(See Mr. Tischlex's motion under