Laserfiche WebLink
QVIt?? ?f XM4 (oXuts#.ebr, (04io <br />CITY OF NOFd.TH OLMSTED BQAJI9 OF. Z4NING APP'EELS <br />REGULAR NL?ETITTG HE73D AT THE C2'I°Y HALL JUNE 4, 1963 <br />Meetin.g was called to order at 7 a40 P.Pi. <br />Nembers Present s Nles srs e Greene9 Klini.'ce, Morgan and umith <br />Members Absent; N.r. BYE3"5 <br />,A,1.so Present: Mxa Fr-nest J. Gundy, Bu.ilding Commissioner <br />' Others a.s listed under ttA,ppel.7.ants"m <br />Ntinutes of May 21, 1963 Special Meeting were read and appresved. <br />1. Appellants 11r. ICenneth Holmok' 25747 Lfiztternut Ridge Rd., N. Olmsted, 0e <br />Referencee Erection of a stable at the above addresse <br />} Proposed structure would be in violation of present Zoning Ord., Chapter 1151o04a <br />Yare t9EI or, Iyage 33a <br />Present at meeting. 'Mr. Kezuleth Holxn.ok, 25747 Butternut.Ridge Rd. , N. 01*nsted; Qa.- " <br />Mr. L. J, Sma.llsreed., 25735 3utternut Ridge Rd. t` <br />Mr. & Nirso Alex Toth, 25717 Butternut Ridge Rd. "Mro RicYiard. Snowden, 25635 Butternut Ridge R.da °6 <br />. P1r. Yaul A. Rumbaugh, 25687 Iiutternut Rid_ge Rdo rt <br />' and ot,her interested neighbors This meeting Tqa.s a re-hearing in that appellant had not been notified of the.• <br />May 21, 1963 hearing. <br />Objecting statements by neighbors at the Kay 21., 1963 meeting were revieV=ed ar_d . <br />neighbors To-L•h and. Sma? lsreed again strangly confirmed their previous statements s <br />Neighbors Srlowclen and Rumbaugh joined the objeetors stating they baelced <br />Mr, and NLrs. Toth and Mr. Smallsreed lOQ%, <br />A,ppe7.].ant stated that a'stable need not-be dirty, have odors, or bring in rats,. <br />He ha.d upagraded the hoi?se since his purchase a.nd intended. to keep the stable,clean <br />and orderly» Stable would. be J.ocated in such a manner that it would not b1QCk, <br />anyonets view or cause inconvenieiice. Corral would be built, thus preve.-Liting <br />horses jiamping a barriex°o ,Al.so, th3re were other "barns" in his vicinity. <br />Luil.ding Com-iiissione?^ pointed outi the fact that the other 1°barnssa are non-conformi.r.g- <br />buildings. ,A,l.so, a corral would be considered an accessory building and would de- <br />crease ejren more the required distance necessary as stated in thE Code. <br />rIz . Kl,inite moved that. becatzse of the violatior_9 appea.l, be der.iedo Motion secanded. <br />tsy Mr. Smzth ancl uranimously app.roved..