Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Zoning..kppeals <br />Sept. 17, 1963 Meeting - Page 3 <br />3, Appellant; Parls Ridge Homes, 287$6 Zynhaven Dr., N. Qlmsted, 4hio. <br />Represen e Mr. S. S. Biskind <br />Referenee: Side I,ine footage variance fox a proposed home to be built on 5/L 61 <br />1,ocated in the Park Ri.dge Hoanes A].lotment, 6177 Forest Ridge Dr.a <br />N. 01-ms-ted, 0. Request is in giol.ation of Zoning Qrdo 62-333 <br />Chapter,7e159, Sab-Chapter 1159Q02. <br />This 3.ot is on the corner of Fores-t Ridge and TeTindsor rcaads. Windsor Road is on a <br />eurvatux°e and one end of the garage will extend only 13t from the side line. Tlaere <br />are 25+ Plus at the other end oi the garagem There are no neighbors invo].ved and <br />no other lgt butts up to this propertyo Tlze 121 variance is asked on the curve o:£ <br />the street. <br />Mx. Byers maved that the variance be grantedo Motion seconded and un,a.n& approved. <br />4, Appellant: Brzscino Development, Inc., 15411 Cha.tfield A,vee, C1eveland, Ohioo <br />Reference; Request for up to 82t back yarcl ?rariances for proposed homes to be <br />built in the Deerfield Subdivision, N. 07msted, 0. Request is in <br />viol.ation oi Zoning Orde 62-33, Chapt er 1163, Sub-Cha.pter 1163a01. <br />Represented by Ntr. R. Mongell.o <br />Mr. Ray Brusci.no <br />a],soz Mr. Saul Biski-nl. <br />Appellant is asking for up to 821 back yard variances on an uncer-cain perczntage o= <br />hom.es, depending upon salese Two models of contemplated homes will ha.ve attached <br />garages, and two models will have detached garages. The attached garage homes will <br />requixe the variances. Appellan-t ha.s tried to obtain some of the rear property, <br />but has been unsuccess.ful.. This subdivision was approved by t he Planning Commission <br />in 1962. Streets and wa.ter are already in. <br />14r. Biskind voiced t he opinion that builders who are coming in for back yard <br />variances are going to build a better home. He feels that where homes are built <br />ifith attached garages, there is still plenty of back yard for the residence• <br />Mre Mongelle s-tated that there has been discussion in the P].anning Canmittee regard- <br />ing a more flexible rear yard, and he will agai.n bring this up at their meetings. <br />Mr. Greene moved -i-,hat variances not to exceed 821 on homes Vrith attached garages <br />be granted on Sublots 19 thru 67. When appellant is ready to build on Fawn Drive <br />in this all,e'ument, he wil.l then present appeals. Motion seconded and approved by <br />Messrs. Greene and Morgan. Mr. Syers did not approveo <br />" 3-