|
Board of Zoning Appeals
<br />june 9, 1964 Meeting
<br />P'age 2
<br />?
<br />2,
<br />.
<br />A,ppe7.larato ivIatherson B1dg. Coa, 5481 W. 227 Sta, Farkview 26, 0.
<br />Represented ky Nire W3.lliam Nude]man
<br />Ref, Setbx ck reduction fram 254 to 114 on home propased for
<br />S/L 7472 locateci on the corner of Porter Rd. and Northern .A,ve.,
<br />N o. O7.m.sted, 0. (Vio7ation of Zoning Ord m 62-33 Chapter 1159 y
<br />Sub-Chapter 1159s02, Page 41).
<br />Appellant states tha.s corner lot is 401 wide and canr_ot be en:la.rged. Variance
<br />a?s necessa?r fox° building a home and. making? use of this lanclm Tnere is a creek
<br />on the back end of lot, which creek wwil.l not be covered, klr. & Mrs a Stevezis,
<br />5553 S. Porter Rd:o9 oppose buildirzg a nome on tnis lot; stating that there isn't
<br />raom for a house and there tiri11 be no ba.ck yard because of said cx°eek. l3oth
<br />Mr. K1.inite and IyIr. Greene felt that a home coulcl na-t be built on this lot,
<br />buildixig withi.n code req,uix°emen.ts 0
<br />Motion was moved by 1zr. Smith, secorvded by Mra Gx`eene, tha.t vari.ance request be
<br />den:a.ed.a Motion unanir?zously approvedo
<br />3.
<br />Appellant s Henna.e Hom.es Bldg, Co e, 4402 W. 215 St., Fa.ixvieta Park 26, 0o
<br />1-?.epresented by kZr. Rocco Puzzitie3.l,0
<br />? Refo ' Rehea.ring - back yard variances for proposed homes to be buil,t on
<br />Tree Lane in the Woadview Subaivision #2,, N. O1.iiisted, Oa
<br />(Vi,olation of Zoning Ord. 62-33, Clapter 1163., Sub-Cliapter ll,b3@G1,
<br />page 12).
<br />A1.so presents Mr. R.ichard I'u.zzitiello, Nr. Alex Iianareff, Mrm E. H. Moodt,
<br />3463 C1ague Rd. (back of S/L 18), and Mra H. R. Rosser, 3507 Clagu.e,
<br />(ba.ck of S/L 13).
<br />This case was heard kyy the Boa.rd on A,pri1 7, 1964, and appeal deniedo A,ppellant
<br />subsequently presented 'nis case to the P1.anning Committee and -chen to Council,
<br />arad both recomm.enci that variances as requested be granted. YLra Kanareff easplained
<br />titiaa.t this subclivisioaa had been :Laid-out pri-or to its purchase by Hennie Homes.
<br />Boarct IJiember Nir, Smith was opposed to gx°anting of blanket va.riances, fealing that
<br />the px°opex° size homes staoul.d be buil,t on tiaese lotse rZessrs. lioodt and Rossear
<br />concurs°ed. lir. Klinite fel,t -that imsmuch as the Pl,anning Comunittee and Council
<br />r°econur_enclEd the gariances, the Baard should grant variances on a certain percentage
<br />of the hcmes, and moved that the follow3.ng be gxanteds
<br />Un. Sublats `i th?.:°u 69 12; and 15 thru 21 0-
<br />4 StiUl.ots to kiave a
<br />? 5 sublots to nave a
<br />5 X Sub"lots to iia.ve a
<br />14 St?;b:Lots
<br />t>ack yard variance of not more than 15t
<br />back yard vari.ance of not more than lOt
<br />back yard variance of not more than 41
<br />NIr. Greene secondeci 1vIr. IS1.ixa7,tee 5 r,totioBl and motion was appra9red by the balan.ce of
<br />Baa.rcl NIembers with the exception of Ilrre Smitl2p who voted BtNo,".
<br />(Mro Smith asked -to be excused from meeting at this point).
|