Laserfiche WebLink
Eoard of Zoning A-ppeals <br />: June 99 1964 tleeting <br />Pa.ge 3 <br />i? <br />4„ Appellarl'c. P4rs Archie Ference, 23578 Sharon Drm, N. Olansted, 0o <br />Ref a Request for a 21 Side Lir.e Variam.ce in building oi a proposed <br />garagem (Violation of Zozi?.ng Ord. 62m33, Chapter 1151, Sub- <br />Chapter L61Q01, page La.). <br />Cement platform has already been poured for said garage. Appellant nresented a <br />letter from neighbor Troy Drake, 23596 Sh,aron Dr., indicating no objection. <br />Mr. Greene moved that variance be granted. Motion seconded by IKr. Klinite ar.d <br />uxka.n:isnously approvedD <br />5. Appellant: DZr. Donald Hami11, 3565 Walter Rd., N. OLmsted, Od <br />Ref:: Installa-tion of a42t1 high chain lint fence around the Y?ack <br />portion of his property. Height of a certain portion of <br />this fence is not to exceed 30". (Zanin.g Ord. 62-33, Chapter <br />1151, sub-Chapter 1151Q04 (x). <br />.?,ppellantts property is on a corner lot. Portion oa fence in violation of code <br />is 1Q--1/21 long, plus a, gate, which fence will be at-tached to the back of home, <br />facing Walter Rd, <br />? Qppellant presented letters from neighbors Edii, J. O'Mal].ey, 3583 walter Rd.9 <br />William J. Camion, 3547 zqalter Rda, and H. D. Humphrey, 24438 Rosita Lane, <br />indicating no objections. <br />Inasmuch as appellantfs 10t is on a eorn.er and fencing has alreaay been delivered, <br />Mr. Iflinite moved 'Uhat variance be approvedv Motion seconded by Mr. Greene and <br />unanimously approved, <br />5s Appellant: Yir. 14. Tessin, 23336 Stoneybrook Dr., N. Olmsted, 0. <br />Ref : The installation oi a 4811 high chain link fence, a portion of <br />which should be no higher than 30". (Zoning Q-rd. 62m33, Chaptex <br />1151, Sub-Chapter 1151,04 (x). <br />.Appellaizt has had a 4811 high Uasket-weave and chain link fence 3.nstalled by Sears <br />around his back yard with a certain porticn of the cha' 1'nk ,c.-ng across the <br />front of the yarci., attaching to the back of his housel?ion of the fence <br />on"Gf. 233rd S-t. is also in violation of the Code. $ppellant's home is on a corner <br />loto Appellant was not aware or the code violation, leaving this up to tne <br />installer. Sears will be notified of No. Qlmsted fence code. <br />Because of the above circiunstances, Mr. KLinite movea that variaz ce be branted. <br />1qotion seconded by Mr. Greene and unanimously approveda <br />0