11/13/1964 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CZTY UF NC,RTH OLIvISTED - 80ARD OF ZUNING xPPF..ALS REGULI),R Tv?EETING HELD AT THEE GITY HALL - NOVBNiBER 13, 1964 Nleeting called to order at 7:45 p.m. Members presen'c a R4essrs. Byers, Greene, Klinite, Mrs. Eian (Mr. Schaaf arrived at 8a00 p.m.) Also present: Mre Gundy, Building Ccmmissioner Others as listed under appellants Niinutes of the special meeting October 27were accepted as submitted. 1. Appellant: Ivir. Yurt Richards, 5176 trVest Park Drive, North Olmsted. Ref : Reauest for va.riance to erect an 84 x 101 tool shed at the seax -of his propertyy, which is in violation of Zoning Grdi- nance of Nori:h Olmsted 62-33, in which atool. shed is not specifically indicated as apermitted use. Mr. Richards sai.d the same tool shed was built on his previous property in a,nother state in conformance witYa the lawp and it was taxed as an improvemento `;Co support his request, he asked the BoardTs interpretation of several paragraphs of the Zoning Urdi- nance, 1133.11, 1151.01 and 1151.04, and said his shed was better than many structures all.owed by the Gade. 14r. Greene said 1ze had no objections to the requeste except as a result of the previous hearings in November, 1962 on similax requests. Mr. Klinite then read minutes f rom the November, 1962 raeeting on requests for vari - ances on sheds already bui3t when the requests were made, and $he interpretation of the Law Director. N1r. Klinite said he felt any- thing no-t prohibited by the Ordinance would be permissible, andth at the siied was not prohibited. lvlr. Greene iiloved i:hat the reQuest be granted on tne basis that the Zoninb Ordinance does not prohibit sucn sheds. Mr. Klinite seconded. At this point, Mr. Schaaf suggested a letter be written to Council $o ask f or clarifi.cation of tlie Accessory Builciings 5ection of the Code. Niotion was passed una.nimously. 2. Appellant: Mro Jack IIowells, 24116 Beech Lane, North Olmstecl. Ref : Request for variance to builcl an attached garage and porch onto his home, whicn would require a front yard setback of 41811, which is in violation of Zoning Urdinance 62-33, Sectian 115 9.01, which stipuiates f if ty feet seibacks. Mr. I3owells indicated his request for variance was for 418" iristead of 9' as indicated on plans original _V submitted to the Building Departrrient. His lot is on a culdesac. Discussion revealed that his home had to be built with less than the fifty foot setback, and that his proposed garage would only extend eignteen inciies closer to the street. Mr. Howells showed original blueprints for his home, whi ch ca11 for the location of the garage as he i.s npu= requesting. Adjacent neighbor, Nir. Robert McGoun, 24112 Beecn Lane, voiced ob jection tD