Laserfiche WebLink
the request, saying it tivould jeopardize his property value. Council- <br />inan Mrs, Virginia ilodgins said the proposea garage would sliut off <br />Mr. McGoun's prcoperty. Mr. Ted Sinko, 24298 Beech Lane, corrunented <br />similarlyo The discussion brought out that different plans submitted <br />by iML. Havaeils showed different distances tne garage v,rould be from <br />tlle street. ivTr. Gund.y then produced the plat for Beech Lanee Rgr. <br />Gunc?y stated he Uelieved the Building Cominissioner at the time the <br />house was built useci an average distance frozn the street in deter- <br />mining proper distance for the setback. Mr. Sinko subgested the <br />location of the ga.rage be staked out. Mr. Robert Connelly, 24134 <br />Beech Lane, concurrede Mr. Klinite suggested the stakes be high <br />enough to simulate true garaoe height, and that the Board meiubers <br />appear to see the layout, Nir. Hawells then asked ir he could place <br />the garage on the existing Foundataon line of his house. <br />Mr. Greene moved to table the variance request until the next meel;irg, <br />so that the members could see the staked out situation, which Mr. Howells <br />indicated ivould be done within a fetiv dayso Mr. Klinite secanded. Motion <br />to table was vQted unanirnously. <br />3. Appellant: Nlra Edward vEmeter, 2430 Graritwood Drive, parma, Onio. <br />Ref : uequest for variazzce of three feet on sideline on sublot <br />112 (5861 Gareau Drive) ?ark I2idge, for the construction of <br />a house, i,r'nich is in vs,olaticsn of Zoning C7rdinance 62-33 of <br />North t7lmsted, Sectgon 1161.01, which stipulates fiifteen feet <br />side yards. <br />Rir. Demeter indicated he tvas representirg a Mr. iMcl7dugald, of North <br />Olmsted, actual purchaser of the property s.n question. Mr. Ralph <br />Schwaxzwalcier, 5375 Gareau Drive, appeared to oppose the vaxiance <br />request, saying his garage nad tc, be reduced in size to coraply with <br />zoning requirements, and that he cv uld not get two c ars into it. <br />Councilman John West also voiced his ob jections to the variance <br />request. <br />Mr. Schaaf moved to deny the request. Mr. Klinite seconded. 11ote to <br />deny the request was unanimouso <br />4. Appellant : Mr. Frank I?olesh, 23822 Taelmere 17rive7hlor th Olmsted. <br />Ref : Itequest for variance to build a garage which would be eighteen <br />inches from the lot line, necessitated by a builderts error <br />in laying out the driveway, vahich violates Zoning Ordinance <br />62-33, Section 1151.04 (C), tqhich restricts garages to five <br />feet from the lot line. <br />Mr. Dolesh eommented on how errors haUbeen made ira the layout of his <br />property. No one atipeared in oppos3tion, including Rflr, llickelmeyer, <br />the affecteci neighbor, 23838 Delmere Drive. It was trought out that <br />the strip of ].and on the Dickelmeyer property on which the Dolesh <br />driveway had been laid sncorrectly had been deeded by Mr. Dickelmeyer <br />to Mr. Tlolesh, Mr. Klinite asked Mr. Dolesh to obtain a letter f rom <br />Yir. Dickelmeyer givsng his approval to the pror?.?osed garage locataon. <br />Mr. Klinite moved to grant the variance, stipu].atang eighteen inches, <br />if a letter from Mr. Uackelmeyer wouid be secured by Mr. Dolesh. Mrs. <br />Eian secondedo Vote was unanimous. <br />2