06/02/1965 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Page 29 <Tun.e 2, 1965 in violation of `Chapter 1225.01 (C) Sub 2 as it urould not be withi.n. 500 fte. of Louann subdivision development, ? -IvIrs, Ivlarjorie Budlow, 28129 Terrace, objected' saying signs had been on that corner for three years' had presented a danger as many children waited --'Lor scYiool busses there;; the signs hud not been repaired and -urere undesirable, She fel.t sign for development should be on corner of T,ouann and not on Terrace and MacIianzie. lirs. (xibbs of 6463 kZacKenzie voiced her objection for the same reasons. Costa said his plans were ' ior a quality sign9 advertising quality homes, and would incorporate at a later date, other advertisers' thus elim.inating need for many signs. 14r. Byers moved ta grant the variance if sa.gn would be no J.arger than 41 x 8:'ft.., erected on the notheast corner of Terrace and YiacKenzie, ancl left there no longex° Yhan Sept, lst. As there was not a second to the motion., the motion lost and variance zsas not granted, iirse Eian rcoved to grant the variance for a sign' stipulating total sign area of both the existing sign on Lorad.n and kIacKenzie and the development sign, shall not exceed 100 sqo fit. Second by Mr. }3yeb°s.. Vote was unanimouse 4. Request for variance (1133013) by 1-Lr. John Haw}cins' 23477 Greenwood Lane, North 01ms-ted' to add a 14+ x 201 family room to rear of existing house, whieh would resu].t in rear yard of 36', this being in vi..olation of Section 1163.01 which requires rear yard of 50p. Mr, Hawkins presenteci a list of signatures of neighbors who stated they had no objec- tian to his request for variance. T,ist follows s Mr. & llTrs. Paker' 23465 Greenwood., Tir &?'irs, Eisenhoi;rer, 23481 Greenwood, hTro & 14rs o I4TcCullough' 23485 Greenwood, tire & Mrs. Stanard, 23469 Greentiiood and lIr. & Mrs. Rolande1139 23473 Greenz,rood. Mrs. Fiian moved to grant the variance. Secgncity Mro Byers. Vote was unanimous. 5.. Appellant; l?3ra robert Pinkie9 4842 Yiartin Lrive9 North Olmsted I,iefs :I3equest for variance (1133•13) to build a detached gaxage ti,rhich wiZl be 121 from rear of house, which is in vi.olation o£ Section 1151.04 (C), lhz.s ordin- ance requires a private detached garage be located so that no part of satne sha11 be within 20' of a dwel.lingm Mir. Pinkie said .his land slopes; in back, presenting a problem in erecting a garage farther back on propertye Also numerous large trees would have to be removed. Septic tank installation also pmcludes loea-tion father back than proposed site. No one appeared to avjeet to the variance. T-Trs. iTian moved -to grant the variancee Second by Mr, Byers, Vote was unanimous. 6,_ Appellant: Mobil Oi1 Company9 28233 Zorain 13d.9 North Olmsted. P-ef: Hequest for variance (1133.13) to install pole sign on ?TacKenzie ?.da As a pole sign is already installe d on I,orain ?d., request is in violation of Chapter 1225,02 B(3) which states onepple sign is permitted. Builders ior the station' iyiessrss Sam ITarkus and S. 1. F'in.esil.ver, were present to ? present plans and request for variance. They stated building plans had been approved. In the plans two signs iiere shown. During the couuz'se of construction the Zoning Ordinance was changed9 stipulating one poZe sign on a property. Sign permits were not applied for; they assumed the approval of the bualding plans inclUded the permi.t :for two signs, A1]: necessary construction yor second sign9 to be erected on 1,11acKenzie