06/02/1965 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Page 4' June 2, 1965 ? t?iessrse ,rank I?Ioss and Richard T'uzzi-tiello represerited Henia.ie Homes, Mr. P?Ioss? stated the firm plans to build houses ranging i.n price from 625,500 to 6-32,000, a11 with at-tached garages, on these 1ots. Buyers favor larger rear lots rather tlan maximum-front yaxd setbacks. In order to have a uniform appearance in the subdivi.sion9 to avoid having some houses jut out farther than others., variances are needed zn front yard setbacks. t- i?ir. ?toss referred to minutes of the Board of Zoning ?.ppeals (?Tune 9, 196l?) gran ing variances to the ra3rway Land Co, for various front setback footage in Tx°ee I,ane Subdivision #2. The present request is for varian.ces on those lots not covered in the June 9' 1964, appEalo Mr. Vi.ncenf, Lynch, who is building a home on S/L 52, iqas present. His home has a 70 ft, front yara setback. xe voiced no objection to builder's plan for a uniform subdivision. Yir. Leslie 14acs said tYie Planning Comnission had origanally approved the sub- division for 14'.19,000 to I?20,000 homes and was pleasea that the present developer plans yil26'000 to $32,000 homes. Ivlx°. Richards of -Uiast Park Drive' objected, stating he felt request for such a great number of gariances affected awhole eommtinity and publ.ic notice should have been given to the commnity. lTir. Greene pointed out that publication in local nebas- papers did not constituf,e proper notif'ication; that iti is required that notification be sent first elass mail on1.y to those involved in immediate vicinity. Mre Byers said that inasmu.ch as the Planning Commission and Gouncil had recommended blanket setbacks as set forth in the minutes of June 9' 19649 and these had been granted, he would make the folloVain.g motion: In order to permi-t the builder to establish a uniform 5etback, setbacks now varying from 35 to 40 ft.a the request for variances be granted' providing all Yiouses have attached garages, and on S/L 54 front yard setback be a 54 ft,. mi.nunum0 Second by Nlrs. Tiana Vote was unanimous. 9. Appellant: Mrm Robert W. Lottig9 24237 14oodmsre' North Qlmsted. Ref: iequest for variance (1133.13) to erect a patio roof, 20' x 141, attached to rear of home, leavi.ng a reax yard meas urement oz 36to Kequest is in violation of Zoning Ordinance 1163.01 which requires a minimum rear yard depth of 50e. Mr. Zottig presented his plans, No one appeared to object -the variance. Mr. Byers moved to grant the variance. Mrs. Eian seconded. vote was unanimous. Mee-ting adjourned at 10s55 PaIq. Ch.airman - - - ----- cretary E