09/15/1965 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

? Page 2' September 15., 1905 Board of Zoning A,ppeals Mr. Ifl.inite read Sego 1133-15 pertaining to "Notice to Gouncil°t and asked the secretary to send a letter to the Council including the motion for a rulinge ? 2. AppeJ.lants Columbia Estates, Inca, 25777 Yeoman ,Dr.? Westlake, Ohio Ref; Request fior variance of 1@l ft, sideline on property at 24145 Pa1m Dr., Nort,h 0lmsted. iTlequest is in vioiation SecP 1151.01 which requires sum of two side yards sha11 not be less than 15 ft., the minimum width of side yard' on one side, not less tran 5 ftg Home: was constructed 3 years ago and when sold recently, survey for title work showed discrepancy. Mr. Greene moved to grant tYrz variance. Second by I4irs. Ei.an. Vote was Unanimous. At this time, 8;30, Mr. Greene left the meetings 3. Appellant: Fark kuto (fu'linic, 5623 Barton Rd., North 07.msted (Roger Neff) Ref; Request for variance to erect a proposed building 25 feet from the street line at approximately 23860 Lorain Rd..., between Masonid Temple and 4. Kaserman Beverage Store. Request is in violation of Sec. 1174.02, which requires 501 setback irom street 1.ine. Mr. Veff and TYTr. Leonara l3ade, partners9 presented their planso, They stated they would 1iketo line the ir building with the Kaserman Beverage Store., which is 25' from street 1ine. They said buildings to the east were much closer to the streetP If they place their bui.lding with 50 1 setback' it would not be seen by traffic. If they place ii 25" back, parking of cars will be in rear. Tlr. Kaserman was present at Town Fiall on September l, a-t z,rhich tima he Trranted it made lmown that he was in favor of this variance. Mro SchnLitt moved to grant the variance. Second by IAr. Byers. Vote unanimous. 4• Appellant; Tony and Anna Severyn,, 4494 4ak Circle 9; North 4lmsted R-ef; Request for variance of 31,side line and 1?' back line for a detached garage. Request is in viola-tion Sec. 1151.04, sub- paragraph C. which requires a detached garage to be a minimum of 51 from rear and side lineo Mre Severyn presented his plans for a two-car detached garage' stat3:nn„g that if it were to be placed vri.th 51 in rear arx3 side9 it would be d.ifftctzlt• to make the turn into the garage a Mr. Stroebel, of 23841 Oak I,ane, wlzose property abu-ts in the rear, said he woulu prefer more than 31.'between garage and his line but would not object if it were held i;a 3?', ??'• Severyn could main-? tain his property in tkiat spacee 1"jr. and Tvirs. Thomas Ryan, who are puxchasing Raepka home on S/L 34, were present. Rear of their property would be at side of Sevei-jn garage.. They objected it aould cut down thezr view and felt 21 between their line and garage was not sufficiento Their rear yard measures 431. It was pointed ou't that this parcel had al.ready been granted a varianca of 71 from 501 rear setbacka_ After a discussion a compromise on the side line was reached. '14r. Byers inoved to grant the variance of rear line ? of 12f and side line of ??:' o Second by l?iro Schmitt. Vote unanimous.