09/15/1965 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Page 3, September 15s 1965 Board of Zoning Appeals 5. Appellants W. B. Pate, 29568 Stewart Drive9 North Olmsted • ReFs Request for variance of 21 side yard setback on Sublot 64A., 6184 Christman Drive, North Olmsf.eda Request is in violation Sec. 1159e02, which r equixes minimum setback on the street upon which the side of the house faces sha11 be 2:5 feet. Mr. W. B. Pate stated house for this lot is sm.allest of their models and is not as yet under conspruction. Lot measures 62, on Christman, 77 at rear 1ine., side facing Cambridgeo TJirs. Eian moved to grant the 21 variance on the steet sidea Second by Mre Iiyers, Vote was unanimous. 6. Appellantr Mrs. Lydia Cas.hmers 3619 West Park ?Dr., C1,eveland 11., Ohio Ref: Request for permit to build a home on S/L 172 which is located on the corner of Porter Rd. and Northern Ave., NOrth Olrasted. This corner lot is 401 wide and cannot be enlarged. In order to bu:i.ld home as proposed appellant is aski.ng for a setback reduction from 25 ft, to ii Itm Z'his does not eonform saitki Sec. 1159m02, Urhich requires a 25 ft. setbackm Reference was made by i?ix. Klinite to fkie minutes of June 9, 1964. At that time the Matherson Bldg. Co., 5481 W. 227, Parkview' made an id entical appeal for variance for this lot. Variance was denied o Nir. and Mrs. Stevens9 5553 Porter., and T4rso Jarrard9 5522 Porter9 taere present and objected -to the building of a home on this 1ot, stating it was not large enough fo:c a home, that the creek in back' which is not covered, would not allow for a backyard. Gouncilman 14est pointed that tihis was a tremendous amount of footage to ask for as a varianceo N1r. Gundy stated tha-t the size of house which this lot woul d accommodate would be too small to pass building code regula-tions. Inanswer to 14rs. Cashmere s question as to what to do Ttri.th the 1and if she coixld not build on it'. Mr. West said there was a Site Committee i.n the Council: and she could contact -them to see if tYere was a possibility that this 1.and could be utilized in future plans for some city use. NIro Klinite stated that T•Zrs, Cashmer had another recourse; one more appeal could be maaey that to the Court of Common Pleas. Mr. Schmitt moved to deny the request for variance. Mr. Byers seconded. NIotion was unanimously approvedo 7m Appellantt North Park Homes' Tnc,' 5316 -rlarrensville Ctro Rd. Maple Hts.,Om aBf a Request for variance to build a home on S/L 49' 28265 PTandina Drive9 11TOrth 0lmstede Lot is corner tJandina Drive and roamellia Lanee Home yor this 1ot has been sold and appEllant is asking For a setback reduction of 100. 11equest is in violation of SecO 1159.02' which ? reauires minimum setback on the street upon which the side of the house faces sha1.1 be 25 feet.