11/03/1965 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

A4inutes, Board of Zoning Appeals Page 3, Nov. 3, 1965 Plaza to Elmhurst, should be moved to the north approximately 201, to make ? entrance easier. Present were Mra Henry E. Schneider, represen.ting Mr. Henry Blumenstein, whose property abu ts in the rear, and Mr. and N1rs. J.Ea Campbell., whose prope rty is adjacent, to the east. Mrs. Dan Clark, 5722 E].mhurst9 N1r. Jos. Kearney3 5619 GJhitehaven, and Mr. Robt. lliartin., 5647 ?,jhitehaven' were present,, questioning the safety of -`uh.eir children boarding school buses at the head of Elmhurst. Mrs, "L"ampbell stated trees mentioned in the appellant's presentation zTere vexy small and certainly Ffrould noti obstruct view oi the end store. She said roots of these trees had been injured in the claring of land for the Plazam She ob- jected very mucli to the fact that two massive oak trees on th e lot line, had be en cut. Mrs. Eian moved i:o grant the varia.nce, sub j ect to the i ollotai rg: That appellant cieed 51 to the city on the entixe Vresterly depth of his property., for purpose of widening E3.mhurst Dr°.; that the southerly driveway 'Lrom Plaza into Elmtnzrst llre be moved north by approximately 200; and that curbing be placed along Elmhurst lot line, Second by Mr, Nelsono Unanimously passed. 6. A;ppellant; lro Peter Rzepka.9 rairway Land Com, 4913 Van Epps Rda) Cleve.31 Ref ; Hequest for various frontsrear and side yard variances on sublots 1 through 20 in the Noreen Subdivision, Noreen Drive (easti of Hawkins). aaquest is in violation of Section 1159.01., which stipulates minimum rront yard setbacks Of 50p' and Section 1159.023 which requires mini- mum setback on the street upon which the side of the house faces shall be 251i Section 1163e02' tahich requires minimilD. oi 501 rear yard deptho Present for appellant: Mr. Martin Liston, partner ot Mr. Rzepka, and Mr. Frank Moss, attorneyo They presented plans of the subdivision showing their model horries Qxford and Yale placed on i:tie lots5 indicating al1 setbacks,, also all va-riances needed on the lotsa Mr. IUloss explained tha-c land s-tipulated as "Block Atl on the plans had been deeded to the city for playground purposes. Deeding of this land rnade lots on -the south side of the subdivision more shalloVa. A1so, because of the cul-de-sac layout, lots at the-turn-around are shori,er9 thus neecling variances. Mrs Byers moved that the variances be granted, providing a11 homes have attached garages' with access to the garages zrom the fronto Second by Mr. Greene. Vote was unanimous. The variances are as zoZlows: S/L 1 9' front yard setback 61 street sideline (coY'o) S/L 2 101 t? ?f a S/j, 3 51 u n u S/L 6 15t n ?t S/L 7 15' r' 't 81 rear ,yard setback ??