11/03/1965 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes'Board of Zoning App4als page 2, Novm 3, 1965 . Ref : Fteques t f or variance to build a home on S/L 36, 3651 Hunter Rd e, North Olmstedo Depth of lot3 1461:.8911, depth o? home' 53', leaving a rear yard depth of 43's89'ta Request is in violation of Section 1163a019 which requires 501 rear yard setback. TZr. Or1ean stated.he desires the variance lor the same reason that one is needed on S/Z 37. He plans a larger home than was originally planned for -chis area. Mr. Greene moved to grant the variance of 61.11« on s/L 36. Second by Mrs, Eian. Vote was unanimous. 4. Appellant: Mr. Gerald P. Canty, 24297 Vincent Dr., North Olmsted. xef: ktequest for variance to build a 22' x 221 garage at-tached to side of home and to extend 5' beyond rear of homeo Present depth of rear yard is 411. liequest is in violation ot 6ection 11'o3a019 which requires 50' rear yard setback. .Mr. Canty stated that inasrmzch as depth of rear yard is less than the required depth' it is necessary t o build garage attachecl to side and to extend 51 beyond rear of homea Moving garage forward so that rear of garage would be flush with rear of home is not possible as garage would then cover basemen.t and upper winciow on side of home0 A.rear yard variance of 91 was granted th e b uilder, Rzepka, at time this home was constructedo Mrs. Eian moved to grant tlB variance of 51. Second by Nlra Greene, Unanimous].y passec?, 5. Appellant: Mr. R. J. Gruber, 4575 Concord 17ra' T''airview Park, Ohio Kef: Request for variance for Elmhurst Plaza Shopping Center, 29462 Lorain Rd. Appellant plans to erect building. and is aslcing for 201 sideline setback. Out of this 201 they have offered to deed 51 to the city for road purposes., to add to 31mhux'st Dr. Request i or variance is in vio- lation of Section 1174003, tqhich requires a 25, side street setback on corner lot in retail business district. Present for the appellant: Mre John Snead, builder, T4ra in,Tillard Gray, architect, and Mr. Vincent Fornes' attorney3 representing 14r. Gruber. Present also, 14r. T1el Limpert, Service and Safety Director. This is second appeal. The f irst appeal, as presented on October- 13., 1965, was denied. The Board felt that erection of -the Plaza as originally planned, would presenl; driving hazardsm Mrs. Eian, rnertber of the Board' suggested at that time that the oti,mer c3eed to the city 5' to be added to widtdl of Elmhurst thereby eliminating some of the congestion which would result frvm cars entering the PlaLa, and exi.ting from it' p1.us t11e cars entering Lorain Rda from Elmhurst, and exiting from it. 1+o11ozTing tkirough on her suggestion' Mrs. Eian contacted the Mayor and Safety Director' which resulted in the appeal by the appellant, as pre- sented above, . The appellant feels plans as noti presented will result in minimum traffic con- gestion, better utilization of land., and tne end store at east end of building can be viewed from Lorain Rdm as trees in adjacent lot Vai11 not o'ostruct it, as in original plansa City engineers have asked builder to construct a roadiide ditch on:Elmhurst along property line, ana sidewalk. A curbing wi11 be built by owner at edge of lot inside the wa1k, so that cars cannot be driven in off Elmhurst and angle parked0 A.t Mr, Eimpertts suggestion, south drivevTay irom