12/01/1965 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ttinutes., Board of Zoning Appeals Page 3, December l. 1965 k4r. Kaserman, speaking for his own businassy and also for members of the ? Masonic Temple taho had delegated him to represent them9 felt there were too many signs at this corner9 presenting a clutter, Fz felt surrounding busi- nesses would sufier fnom this clutter. Members of the Board felt that parhaps some of these signs should be down9 having exceeded permit ti.me, Mr. Foltz offered to check into this matters Mr. Greene moved to grant permi.ssion for erection of the sign' which is to be 4' x41, on a s3x month basis., subject tao renewal at that time if al1 homes are not sold. Second by Mrs. Eian. Vote Vaas unanimous. 7. Appellant: Mr. Arigelo J. Cannnarato.9 6145 1{'itch Rd.' North 07msted. Ref: R,equest for variance to move a 12 story brick dwelling from 26824 Lorain Rde, to 6155 Fitch Ra. Liqable space, first floor., is approx- imately 835 square feet0 ftequest is in violation of Section 1153.01, which speci.fies in A Residence District a 12 story dwelling should have 1150 square feet minunur.i livable fixst f].oor areae Adclitional variance is requested to divide appellant's 1ot, which measuras 1371 wide by 5501 deep9 to 57' X 5501, where he now re- sides' and 809 x 5501, where he proposes to move brick dwelling. Request is in vioZation of Section 1157.01 which requires 80, frontage for lots in Class A area. Mr. Cammarato was present., stat3.ng need based on present home being entirely too small. Neighbors present were i4rs. ti-Jarren Palmer, 6165 Fitch, Mrs. lim. K. Meier, 6121 Fitch and Nlrs. NIoyes., 6190 Fitch, They objected to dividing lot as requested. iAr. Foltz, representing Mr. Mangani and i`r. T,dest of Counci7. Flanningq stated that they-both felt the Eoard should stand by the Zoning regulations.. Mr. I'oltz feels should the house ever be torn down' r_o one could bui.Id on a 571 wide lot. He also explained that a new orclinance had been passed by Council covering the moving of homes. According to the ordinance all ex- penses in.volved in the movung should be determined before hand and d4uble that amoUnt be posted with the city by the owner.* this amount to include supervision by the city of the mov5ng project and a11 city faciliti.es i.n- volved. Also9 the mover must post bond or have inszax'ance in the amount of $300'000, or cash9 posted with cit3r. At this point I4r. Margani catne to the rneeting and expressed his objection to subdividing the 1oto as requesteds believing that lot wid.th as specified in Class A shoulcl be adhered to. Members of tYm Board felt that if the lot were to be divided, '.' it should be divided to 68, and 69 '9 instel af 5€P+ and 801. In refering to the minutes of the Boaxd oI Building Codes., they specify that they would approve,'. the moving of tYe home provi.dirg the Board af Zoning Appeals approves subdividing the lot3 with variance on lot size, and that sidelir_e, setback and square £eet requi'remaz ts are met. ?-T-ir. Cammarato stated he did not o,,,m the house to be moved., but had a verbal agreem&nt to buy it if he could find a place to put ito He said he did not intend at this time to add to the house imediatelg after moving it. PIr. Greene moved to table this rea1uest until tYe next regular meeting.,