Laserfiche WebLink
M3nutes, Board of Zoning Appeals <br />Page 2 Ncember 1' 1965 <br />• and approximately 481 rear yard setbacko Request is in violation <br />of Section 1159.01a which stipulates minimtun front yard setbacks, <br />of 50T, and Section 1163,01' which requires 50' rear yard setbacks. <br />NIr. T.i].ley Lapidus represented the Concord Corp. Present also were neighbars Mr. <br />Frank A. Smith9 24456 Noreen, and IvIr. John Maleski, 2845 Walter Rd. Lot is 65' <br />x 13I4.721. At rear of 1ot is 15' ditch easemento Ditch is covered for approx- <br />imatelY 75 or 80 percent of width of lote Home is I,-shaPe., the garage being <br />Attaclzed. Mrm Smith obj ected to extension of home 10' beyond his' even tho the <br />extension would be only the I,-portion., ar.d that portion situated on the far side <br />of the lota away from Mr. Smith's home. The extension would be approxi.mately 46, <br />away from front af Mr, Smith 's home. <br />Mr. Foltz expressed the 6p3.nion t,hat houses should be built to suit the lot' with <br />attachsd garagesq Mr. Lapicks stated Planning Commi.ssion was of the opinion t,hact <br />building larger houses would upgrade the subdivision, <br />Mro Maleski' whose lot abut,s in the rear, wanted to be sure when ditch is paded' <br />he does not get trs overflow. Ch1 all lots with 15' ditch easement, the 15 is <br />included in rear yard setbacks e <br />Nr. S?nith felt his value of his property -das bei.ng dotiangraded by placement of <br />home 101 beyond his, A discussion followed concernin.g a compromise.9 allowing a <br />5+ variance 3n front yard setback and 71 in rear yard, Mre Smith did not wish to <br />accept a compromiseo <br />Mrs. Eian moved to grant a 5" front yard variance and a 71 rear yard variance. <br />Second by Mr. Byers. Vote was unanimous. <br />5« P:ppellant: Concoxti Corp.., 14305 Washing-ton Blvd.9 University Hts., 18., 0. <br />Ref; Request for variance to build a home with attached garage on S/L 67., <br />24124 Noreen Dr., North Olmsted, with front yard setback of 401 and <br />361 average rear yard setbacke N.equest i.s in violation of Section <br />1159001 which stipulates minimwn front yard setbaclcs of 501., and <br />Section 1163.01, which requires 50' rear yard se-tbacks. <br />Mr. Tulley Lapidus' representing the Concord Corp., said this lot is only 1191 <br />deep on the east side and 125' on the west side. House is 46.4' deep. Mr. <br />Greene moved to grant the appeal as requested. Second By Mr. Byers. Unanimous- <br />ly passed. <br />6. Appellant: N1r. Wm. L. Rinyu, idm. L. Rinyu & Co., 3657 W. 117th St.,Cleve.0. <br />Ref: Request for variance to erect atemporary sign on SW corner Davi.d <br />and I,orain Rd,., advertising model homes in subdiv.i.sion on W. 237. <br />Request is in viQlation of Section 1225.01 C2, which requires sub- <br />division de°jalopment signs to be on the development property., <br />within 500 feet of the development. <br />Present was Mr. Rinyu, also Mro Kaserman9 23900 Lorain Rd. Mr. Rinyu stated <br />? he had permission to erect sign on Precision Realty property, and requested <br />, sign be up for one year. His lots are on Davi.d dr.' seven in nuznbero