06/22/1965 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes of June 22, 1965 _2e Yio-re particularly it is our determinati-on that a passage through the dividing strip of Berkshire Dro so as to permit ingress and egress to a contemplatecl gasoline station to be locateQ on the Tj1est- erly corner of Berkshire and Lo-rain, taking into co sideration the traffic-view problem associated with the entrance markery the trafiic problern associatecl with the narrowness oz -Berk-shire Dro on each sicie of the divzding strip and the traffic problem associated :,%Tith the introauction thereby of in e-sence a four way street intersection would be ad.verse to the public safety and welfare of motorists and ped.estrians in the vicinity, thereof, In view of the above it is also reeommencied that no curb cut onto Berkshire Dr. from the aforemetitioned_ corne-r be permitted. It is al.so the recommencation that the curb cut on Lorain nearest to Berkshzre be shortened to 354. It is also recoffnenc'ea that a fence be erectec on the northern anc'. western property lines and consideration be given to brac'?.ing the rea-r wa11 of the build.inga Discussion ensued and it was moved by NIr°. Ford, seconded by Ms. Fabek, that the PlanT7ing Comrnission go on record and does not allow a cut through the medial strip on Berkshire m YEAS Ford, Fabek, Spalding, Prokasy I?fOS Esgar It was moved by Mr. Prokasy, seconded by IvIra Fabel:, that the Planning Commission go on record that in va.ew of the decision in regard to the medial strip, that there not be a curb cut on Berl.shire. YEAS Fabel:, Spa1G_ing, Prokasy. NOS Ford, Esgar. hARZ KIESEL It was the recommendation of the committee that this proposal be re- jected as the fronta¢es did not meet Tryith t,he city specifications. Discussion ensued and it vras nloved by tlra Esga-r, seconded by PbFr. Ford, that based on the fact that lot no s 2 does not have an $0 foot wid.th at the maximum buildiizg ?;etback line, that, the subclivision be rejected. vEAS Ford9 Esgar, Fabek, Spald.ing, Frolcasy. HOM?,R DFARTH - MARTIN ORZNG DRIVE NLrs.Dearth came before the Commission requestzng the subdivision of 2 lots into 3 lots. Discussion ensued and it vTas moved by ','!!r. Esgar, seconded by Mir. Prokasy, that the Homer Dearth Subdivisioh on Pfiartin Dr?ve be rejected because the northerly sublot has less width at the building line that specifiecl b;T the North Olmstecl Zoning Ordinance a Y"EAS Esgar, Prokasy, H'ord, Fabek, Spalding. Blrs. !:'earth was ad.vised that this i-natter should go before the Zoning Boa-rd of kppeals. RESUBDIVIS ION OF BEVERLY HILLS SUBDZVIST OPI N0. 2 The proposea resubo.iva.sion of Beverly Hi11s aubdivision No. 2 to account for 1$0 was presented sho-Ting 65 sublots. It was moved by Mr. Esgar, seconded by Mr. Prolcasy, to put , this into committee a li'EAS Esgar, Frokasf, Ford, Fabek, Spalding '- Comnmittee-- Esgar and Ford C)