01/05/1966 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PIinutes oi' Board oz Zoning Appeals January 5, 1966 Page 2 • sha11 be 80' vaide' with rninimum area in square feet' 13.,200. Mr. McPherson was present and stated his desire to divide the lot as he ielt a home could be built on a neValy created 80, wiath lot. His home is on the lot now and would have 92.741 frontage after division. Upon examining'the:plans it was noted tha t actual depth of lot was 123.85+ and not 133.85' as specified in the application. Neighbors present were Mr. Steiger9 5125 Colnrabia and Mr. .Ackerman, 5121 Col.umbia. 2'hey had no objection to a home built on 801 vri.dth lot, providing front yard setback,,would be maintained, back yard would line up witki theirs and house, wi.th attached garage, would be comparable in valuation z,ji.th the othe rs in the neishborhoDd. Nr. Nelson moved to grant the variance, as per plan. Tfr. Klinite secondede Unanimously passed. 3. Appellant; Brennanls Auto Body, 25044 Lorain Rd., North Olmsted Ref: Request for variance to construct on the t,op of and at rear of exist- ing building, an entertainment hall to be rented to the general pu.blico Existing buiZding has setback of 401. iiequest is in vi.olation of Section 1174.02,$ which states in retail business district building setback shall be at least 50t from street line; Section 1231.01 and Section 1231.02 (Sub B) which states a nonconforrning building shall not be altered' added to or enlarged unless the additions and original build:ing are made to conform to the yard, coverage and height regulations of the d.istrict in wnich i_t is located. Mr. Brennan presented his plan for adding.., to the existing building. He felt it would be a good source of revenue and addition wou7.d be in keeping with the building, which is only 3 years old. Black topping would be put in rear for parking. Neighbors and nearby lot owners present wereo Mre Henry Janik, 24940 Lorain, Mrs. Focsik, 25050 Lorain3 Mr. Geo. 3iddulph3 26005 Butternut, Nis. Phyllis and Yiagdalene Green9 25069 Lorain, and 14rs. I B. Brackenridge3 24963 Lorain. Mrs Klinite explained to 14r. Brennan that the Board of Zonsng Appeals had no alternative but to turn down his request for variance. On the basis of the Law Director's ruling, a nonconforming building shall not be altered, added to or enlarged unless -the existi.ng building is first rrade to coru"'orm to the yard, coverage and height regulations of the district in which it is located. F:e further explained that upon receiving a denial from the Board of Zonirg Appeals, Mr. Brenna.n could take the appeal to court, Mr. Nelson moved to deny the variance on the basis of the I,aw Dixector 's ruling on nonconforming buildings. Second by Mrs. Eian, Vote Vras unanimous. 4. Appellant: Mr, Carl Endreola' 37045 Chagrin B1vd., Clevel.and N.ef; Request to erect a building east of 25563 Lorain N,d. Proposed build- ing would be 80' wide by 60' in depth, with a setback of 641 for parlcing in front. Rear yard would be 161. Request is in violation of Section 1174.06' which reo,ui.res a rear yard of at leas t 50, shall • be pro vided if any part of the rear line is adjacent to residence district.