02/16/1966 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minuted,: Special Meeting, Board of loning Appeals' Februaty 16, 1966 Page 2 Mr. Nudelman s tated the plans did not show a garage but one would be built, ? attached to rear of home, measuring llt' x 201. He said his intention was to place gravel on unimproved 1Vorthern and entrance to garage would be from there, The point was brought up that with 11' setback' this would not alloii for offstreet parking in the drivewajr. as 171 is needed to get car off side- walk. The street as plan.ned and irhen eventually improved9 would be too narrow to al.low for street parkingo Mr, Seheeff fe)t -vthe:boar.ii:was in a position that it would have to recognize this as a hardship case and under some set of conditions, as buildable pro- perty. A suggestion was made b9 the Board that the open ditch could be til.ed and 3.£ owmer were to purchase tile accordi.ng to city specifications' the city would put it ine thus allowing for the building of a detached garage. A detached garage, •i?l.' built on part of the ditch easement, would be allowed but oiTner must sign an aff?.?dAvit allowing ei.tY to remove tile or portions of garage in case of necessity. A discussa.on followed„ eomerning the size of tY-- home0 It was pointod out that a 12 story home would more nearly approximate livable first floor space requirements in B district and be comparabls to those in the area. A variance would be required in order to build a home to meet code dinen?sionso Also' a variance woul.d be needed if garage were attach,Ed to rear of home, for a rear 3Tard setback. Mr. Nelson moved to deny the variance of 111 setback. Second by Mr. Byers, Vote was unanimcnzs. . 2,, Appel.lant: t'' zel.la Bros., Inc., 25984 Lorain Rd., North Olmst,ed Refs Request for permit to build addition to southwest corner of exi.sting 4?estaurant build3.ng' addition to measure 21' x 211. Fxistin.g buildi.ng is 1114" from front lot line. Request is in viola tion of Seetiori 1174s02 of tYie Zoning Ordinancej, which states i.n retail business da.strict building setback shall be at le ast 501 from street 1ine;; Saction 1231.02 (B) which states a nonconforming building sha11 not be altered., added to or erilarged unless the additions and origirial building are made to conforin to the yard' coverags and height regul.ations of tke district in which it is located. Present were the Messrs. Rinella. They were represented by Mr. Nicholas Zajack, architect. He stated addition was necessary as more space was needed for seatzng with an increase in bu53.ness, Mr. Kitehen refer•red the Board to Sections 1231.01., 1231v02 (B) and 1231,03(B), ltThen asked for his op3n3.oiz' he gtated the Zonsng Board di.d not have tYm author- ity to rule one or grant any variance which pertained to nonconforming build- ings, Mr. Byers mojred that we deny the appeal for variance due to th-, fact that the Board of Zoning Appeals is specifically denied the right ta ruls other- • wi.se by the Zoning Ordinance. Second by PZro Scheeff. Vote was unanirrious„ Meeti.ng adjourned at 9:30 P.M. ? P Wi1liam J. Greene, CYnn. He1.en P. Corey' Se y