04/06/1966 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes Board of Zoning Appeals April 69 1966 Page 4 Mr. Charles A, Novak represented the comparym He stated if they were to build • a 221 width store, the standard width of their stores in the past., they would not need a varianee but they vaish to upgrade their stores and are now building them 30' x 701. He felt they would sti11 get the same amount of business if a 221 width store were bu31t' but this p1an is now considered absole-ice by their company. Parking facilities are planned for 17 cars in front of the stoxes. Stores to be set back 671. Also' parking of 25 cars at rear of stores. Three entrances are planneds one on Lorain and t-tro on Silverdale. Mr,. Jams Prokasy of tY-e City Planning Commis sion was present. He felt grant- ing a side yard variance in this particular instance woul.d add to the traffic problem. Traff3.c volume is great And Silverdale is narrowo Mrs" McCull.ough' whose property abuts Arby's 1ot, objected to the varianceo She felt conges- tion is already bad at this corner. She must wait three turns of the light i.n order to get onto Lorain to go to work. Sha felt there would be danger to children with the added congestion. In checking the architect"s drawings' Iylr. Gunc?y, noted rear of store plan for the three-store unit, was less than the 501 separation between residen- tial property and the store building' at the Urest end oi the building. Mrs. Eian suggested Mr. Novaek contact the builder of the three-store unit to see ii 101 of land could be deeded to the city for Vaidening Silverda1e. i,,Jr. Nelsan moved to postpone the decision until the Board could consult with -the Safety Service Uirector about traffic hazards; also until appell.ant has opportunity to confer with lessor regarding suggestion of deedang 101 of land to the city for widening Silverda].e., 101 strip to be the depth of lessor's lot. Second by D1rs. Eian. Vote was unaimouso 10. Appellant: Mr. Tnrilliam B. Pate., 29568 3tewar:b Drive, North 0].msted Re£: Request for variance to builc3 a home at 6448 Stafford Dra (corner Stafford Dr. ar.d Sutton Dr.) with 17.41, sideline setback. Request is in violation of Section 1159.02,. which requires minimum setbacls on the street upon which the sic3e of the house faces shall be 251. Mr, Pate said home has front yard setback of 55'. To move it back any f.-t,her in order to lessen the amount of sideline variance needed' would mar the appear2nce of other homes in the zmmediate area. Lot has 53.26 frontage on Stafford, 17717't £acing Sutton Dro North lot line is 1651 and rear lot line is 133,44. Variance of sideline of 17.41" is at northeast cor-ner of home. Because of angle of lot li.ne., northwest co-meris 309 from side lot line. Mr. Nelsan moved to grant the variance. second by Mx•o Byers. Vote was unanimous. ;?? James Prokasy,9 Chairman of the City Planning 'Gomma.ssion., commented on the development of many of the new subd.ivisions. He said after the plats have passed the PZanning Commission., many developers have changed lot sizes., there- • by crea-ting a need for variances in order tha.t 1.arger homes may be built on sma3.ler size lots. He said legal size lots Vrere planned so that legal size houses can be built, City Planning feels t,hat houses should be designed to particular 1.ots,