Laserfiche WebLink
, ` <br />. <br />januazy 25, 1966 m ??g(a 2 <br />III 03,d Busiiness . <br />18?llin& A???? S&bdivisiono <br />(a) Mrm 5?alc?ing stated ttlat there ]?ave been amany M'cec?tings <br />anc? ???cu?sioa?? with the developc?r and engineers of Robling <br />Acres Su1????vision9 subse¢guent to vahich the Committe studying <br />?hi? subc??vision rr??ozknendled a rejectiom with ihe sugge?tion <br />.tfl??t i'? ??ould 1?? dividedl int?? ??? subdivisions rat]her than ° <br />?c? ;because it w??,c? not? qua?1?,fy fc?r the c?1ustermt?c? zornz?ag. <br />Mr. A??? Kanareff9 Engd,neer9 ???? ??? suggesti?? ?? ???mitt- <br />tia?? ??? ?rawings; however9 3f the rc?? anded rejection was <br />approver? ?y the Co?????on, it a?ould be o£ no benefit to <br />Rolliu?? ????? ?o appear before the Planning Comnission be- <br />cause of the existing 80mf??t lotsa <br />Upon questioning_ by the Memberse Mr. Kaana-te£f stated that <br />they have access , to Porter R??? ??th of 1-80, aYthough <br />part of the 1.??? ??? nok been pIl.attedo Mre Kanare£f stated <br />furth?? ?? ??uld haVe to rc????? ?o hi? ?lient and be guidec3 <br />therefromo , .' <br />Motion? ??s made by Mre Spalding to rejc??? the proposed cluster <br />cdevelopment of Rolli?? Ac??s as Presen??ed because the Conanittee <br />?eli???? ??? ???division as presem??ed shou1d be divided 3nto <br />tw? subdivisi??s and not one and9 there£oree with two separate <br />subdivision? they? would not qv?alify. ??? the 100mfoot sub1o? <br />minimum ?? ??quireA under the City of Nort&a O1ffisted Zouaiaag <br />Ordia???e #101o . <br />C&aairman Prokasy seconded the motione ??th?? di?cussion by <br />Mr. E????? ??????ying'thc? ??tiona statec? there is no direct <br />?oa???? conm???ti? ?????en the two subdivisions as presently <br />?hown because of being separated by 1m80o <br />Stabsequently Mra S?alding re?tatec? his ffiota??n in accordance <br />?ith the a`????? ??????tioun9 and seconded by Mr. Prokasy. Itoll <br />cdll on the motion developed its passir?? unanimously with a <br />vote of °'yeaP1 ?y a1? the Members present0 <br />??? ?edical Realty Incoxporatedo